Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG

"Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Sun, 03 April 2016 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3F312D0F5 for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ponfIKsgK3v4 for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1ECE12D0E2 for <precis@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [206.123.31.198] (h198.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.198]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89C8747575; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 12:08:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
To: "Barry Leiba" <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 13:08:51 -0300
Message-ID: <FE14CC12-0070-4EDF-BE96-C67DCCDF4375@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVB270GE4e_6MarL7s6Sahj=qYuDX1x09h70Gfn_qLzSCQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160301221928.17792.35793.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1C1668EA-1734-4D90-82E6-3894ECB6407C@viagenie.ca> <56D61E27.40000@stpeter.im> <56F96A20.7030509@stpeter.im> <E5D59850-BE7B-4AB9-863F-E883DA9C4E13@viagenie.ca> <B85A8CBE12087A2E41BC3D35@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <56766496-6ABC-43C1-8A8E-BFF381E47333@viagenie.ca> <56F99A92.9090901@stpeter.im> <CAC4RtVB270GE4e_6MarL7s6Sahj=qYuDX1x09h70Gfn_qLzSCQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_9DFF93B5-3B62-4D2D-A32E-6F5155CED77A_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/B7D1fNWSbgWpoNgOOsQkb98k8BI>
Cc: precis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 16:08:56 -0000


On 3 Apr 2016, at 13:00, Barry Leiba wrote:

>>>>>     I'm sure that the wg is likely to be ok with wg drafts, but
>>>>>     let's do the normal process. Please submit first as
>>>>>     individual draft and we will call later for wg adoption.
>>>>
>>>>   For whatever my opinion as a participant is worth, that would be
>>>>   meaningless, time-wasting, ritual for its own sake.
>>>
>>> disagree. the step from individual to wg is the normal process and 
>>> has
>>> no impact on technical work: the technical work can continue 
>>> whatever
>>> the filename is. Let’s spend time on technical discussions on the
>>> content of the to-be-published draft.
>>
>> I have no preference, but to be clear the -00 versions will be 
>> exactly what
>> is in the published RFCs so that we can more easily track changes.
>
> As AD for now, still, I'll say that I do have a preference, and a
> rather strong one: these are updates to documents the working group
> has already published.  The working group has already decided to
> update them.  Please just submit them as working group documents from
> the start.

Ok. So Peter just publish it and I’ll approve it.

Marc.

> Even going through motions here makes a statement that the
> working group is not working on what it agreed to work on.
>
> Barry