Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG

["Marc Blanchet" <[e-mail]>]

On 3 Apr 2016, at 13:00, Barry Leiba wrote:

>>>>>     I'm sure that the wg is likely to be ok with wg drafts, but
>>>>>     let's do the normal process. Please submit first as
>>>>>     individual draft and we will call later for wg adoption.
>>>>
>>>>   For whatever my opinion as a participant is worth, that would be
>>>>   meaningless, time-wasting, ritual for its own sake.
>>>
>>> disagree. the step from individual to wg is the normal process and 
>>> has
>>> no impact on technical work: the technical work can continue 
>>> whatever
>>> the filename is. Let’s spend time on technical discussions on the
>>> content of the to-be-published draft.
>>
>> I have no preference, but to be clear the -00 versions will be 
>> exactly what
>> is in the published RFCs so that we can more easily track changes.
>
> As AD for now, still, I'll say that I do have a preference, and a
> rather strong one: these are updates to documents the working group
> has already published.  The working group has already decided to
> update them.  Please just submit them as working group documents from
> the start.

Ok. So Peter just publish it and I’ll approve it.

Marc.

> Even going through motions here makes a statement that the
> working group is not working on what it agreed to work on.
>
> Barry