[precis] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-precis-7700bis-08: (with COMMENT)
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 05 July 2017 22:13 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: precis@ietf.org
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5B0127201; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 15:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-precis-7700bis@ietf.org, Marc Blanchet <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.ca>, precis-chairs@ietf.org, Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.ca, precis@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.55.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149929280791.22663.592778419584772415.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 15:13:27 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/EUUBCBgp5KssIEv2WxwiOq1rB4Y>
Subject: [precis] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-precis-7700bis-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 22:13:28 -0000
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-precis-7700bis-08: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-precis-7700bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I like the clear explanation of some of the design choices in here (e.g., the rationale for using NFKC). There are two places that I think a slight bit of additional text might be useful: 1. When talking about processing "each string" in section 2.4, it's probably worth noting that implementations should be careful not to assume that any information received from a wire protocol has necessarily had any of the rules in this document applied to it (as this might allow intentionally noncompliant clients to slip certain kinds of shenanigans past their checks); and 2. Where the final paragraph of section 4 indicates that the operations in this document are not necessarily idempotent, it is probably worth being more explicit that they should be applied repeatedly until the output string is stable; or, if the string does not stabilize after a reasonable number of iterations (is this possible?), that it should be rejected as invalid.
- [precis] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-precis-77… Adam Roach
- Re: [precis] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-preci… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [precis] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-preci… Peter Saint-Andre