Re: [precis] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-08: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 03 July 2017 23:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBF9131810; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 16:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F2kpi_Yg0z7Y; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 16:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 494EF131804; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 16:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.63] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v63NsDgE058208 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Jul 2017 18:54:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <7A34BC2E-57EE-43A9-8A44-AC976BE0BBEA@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 18:54:12 -0500
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-precis-7564bis@ietf.org, precis@ietf.org, precis-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C132E9AB-10A3-4D24-AD87-DA844DA6EDFF@nostrum.com>
References: <149911881124.22832.7633748744729330805.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7A34BC2E-57EE-43A9-8A44-AC976BE0BBEA@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/IScp13P3KP7bnOlJ6cXfA64NbTg>
Subject: Re: [precis] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 23:54:33 -0000

>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Is the 2nd to last paragraph in 13.5 intended as actual instructions to IANA?
> 
> Yes, I think so. Therefore the instruction should be provided in Section 11.1, with a forward reference to Section 13.5 for the explanation.

Is it possible to word the text to be added to 11.1 to minimize the need for IANA to make subjective decisions?

Thanks!

Ben.