Re: [precis] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-precis-mappings-11: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 02 September 2015 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EC01B34A6; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lu2b84iI6JZG; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B43A91B39F9; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C717BDCC; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 00:06:11 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0sWp_TBPJ8by; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 00:06:10 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.73] (unknown [86.42.21.56]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8725FBDD0; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 00:06:06 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1441235166; bh=eg9GkzOjk32UBt2w3rygRUlm38zJrHqkw79Ws9wTvp4=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=TV1YljX/OxU2OLAJV35XmexFPkU18TTcv6FqVmOE0zEFf+Us4bxIGchvsdWG2kxxc +9AsreC+q4jCsIrw31gLhACdWr5nmqkpnMHakhmKiG9XGSwqjSBsvFIF1DrIf8o1HO mv8g3f6N5rL80y1juiUk11yqKMqndBZz09F8p3KE=
To: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20150902220443.12714.44152.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55E77FEE.8050209@andyet.net>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <55E780DE.6060402@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 00:06:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55E77FEE.8050209@andyet.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/LXyyat_Qzic2Oi5P9fJlN0IhtE4>
Cc: draft-ietf-precis-mappings.ad@ietf.org, precis@ietf.org, draft-ietf-precis-mappings.shepherd@ietf.org, stpeter@jabber.org, draft-ietf-precis-mappings@ietf.org, precis-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [precis] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-precis-mappings-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 23:06:15 -0000

Hiya,

On 03/09/15 00:02, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
>>
>> - The write-up didn't tell me if this is likely to be
>> considered as neutral by the Unicode folks, or as
>> something non-neutral. I'm curious about that, but not
>> concerned much. I do think the IESG should be aware
>> though if this is something that might cause e.g.
>> liaison fun for the IAB later on.  (I'm not saying I
>> think it does/would btw, just that I'd like to know if
>> it might.)
> 
> What do you mean by "neutral"?

So I was being too oblique eh:-) Not something I'm good at
I guess.

I'm wondering if this contains anything about which they'd
go ballistic.

S.