Re: [precis] yokohama: no meeting

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Thu, 03 September 2015 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF56C1B3490 for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PpDhyR4N7NYe for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com (mail-ig0-f177.google.com [209.85.213.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 483AE1B3348 for <precis@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbkq10 with SMTP id kq10so20611686igb.0 for <precis@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9PL+q8+9j0OBZDHNh3K5V/QLL70QWbNw2cFsqDBdtY0=; b=gYLpoo58UwV4JWDZ7nzmOZPCZxDRtFjdc8TynDr6WlTxUko8Aa6wvCNimaaIW7sluN xNPCwbPXGaomcOr+u5AQHW5VMKpGGdOXz1JnXE6XsntVWZzY9sQ2sQC35vVE/BxKphtv DAQHHSe8jQApasuNB5Ist0R1NPgGS6wD3xI8g4N1DOF8zswTwH0cvU9znxxXZqU+iMk7 dB6TEzmobSqRwKjcShZYyynaW28MqmJzvpqppGLU0vzYaOINnRUpm5ehJfDCgrd7EIxw MRO3q0h7mWHkJBG0rBrUTkdmmWcF7blQkWcbWlFVf4n6KSLuh/AiN4GN/GNaoNdoDX8w SPDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmTazejFvwH51w+7IId4GgpGWBVW2eLHHiaSVqMT6sCMv2guwcIhBsMMKoqMJrOucJkDBjX
X-Received: by 10.50.73.98 with SMTP id k2mr15399561igv.96.1441303009541; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k70sm106118iod.11.2015.09.03.10.56.48 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, precis@ietf.org
References: <5D7EF0E6-0CDF-4C8C-A43A-9D756050CFC9@viagenie.ca>
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
Message-ID: <55E889DE.4080904@andyet.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 11:56:46 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5D7EF0E6-0CDF-4C8C-A43A-9D756050CFC9@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/WdcT5PTXqLyopRujkF_Lc8lXtzs>
Subject: Re: [precis] yokohama: no meeting
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:56:52 -0000

On 9/3/15 11:48 AM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> Hello,
>   co-chairs think there is no need for a precis meeting at the next
> IETF. Unless someone disagrees, we are not planning to request time slot
> for Yokohama.
>
> Regards, Marc&Alexey
>
> _______________________________________________
> precis mailing list
> precis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis

That sound right. There's the question of whether to keep the WG open at 
all once the current I-Ds are finished (perhaps both -nickname and 
-mappings were approved in the IESG meeting earlier today?), but we can 
talk about that on the list (and the decision is really up to the AD 
anyway I suppose).

Peter