Re: [precis] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-precis-mappings-11: (with COMMENT)

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Wed, 02 September 2015 23:02 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B141B2C42 for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LS4MXqXRZ-GM for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (mail-ig0-f170.google.com [209.85.213.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AD991B53D3 for <precis@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbkq10 with SMTP id kq10so1676614igb.0 for <precis@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mO2KltHxFRIjSGWnuWSDL1QZBBkau3Bc1IX6Sizl8kI=; b=ElbW13P32Sxvr9LHefTnE3q2NDZHF4mYz9CX/UIO2+WCUy23yUnpW/xJXpgs2OB010 9CRnBToD6CM8nCqIzDHIrdOpLsrRJtp7zIig8aFgHLF9t21M5tKqqqVJq1hG5vtmbrcN xnRCJn+lpKU7f1YJfDW/8wtuDBt0taYz3fqYDUIw4vpSCG+6yS5JVjfdT9+hyGt93z3W eB5PerVIoc4dSwsvnkkpDyJCAVOViypGz6xWxfuGM3Fo1KFKVJRq1qAScGgibrN+FEkU sBlwA2me24psRd9BESOTKULdZ64hoR4IL3jEH9pM3bCd3yhSgEMIgbxL9ebbbWU32Z1F CHEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmdZHfzqT5cnoasUJrNxdLhbsfB/Z4ZaSzW+QjrKaFglvT+QRO4i1D2hcLhYxyA5vwGN3td
X-Received: by 10.50.77.110 with SMTP id r14mr5537318igw.69.1441234929803; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local ([2601:282:4201:ef5b:95e9:2445:47d:81c6]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l14sm20245241ioe.35.2015.09.02.16.02.07 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20150902220443.12714.44152.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
Message-ID: <55E77FEE.8050209@andyet.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 17:02:06 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150902220443.12714.44152.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/a8fDm8lNUMelcNC75AtItlX6WqI>
Cc: draft-ietf-precis-mappings.ad@ietf.org, precis@ietf.org, draft-ietf-precis-mappings.shepherd@ietf.org, stpeter@jabber.org, draft-ietf-precis-mappings@ietf.org, precis-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [precis] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-precis-mappings-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 23:02:13 -0000

<hat type='shepherd'/>

On 9/2/15 4:04 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-precis-mappings-11: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-precis-mappings/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> - The write-up didn't tell me if this is likely to be
> considered as neutral by the Unicode folks, or as
> something non-neutral. I'm curious about that, but not
> concerned much. I do think the IESG should be aware
> though if this is something that might cause e.g.
> liaison fun for the IAB later on.  (I'm not saying I
> think it does/would btw, just that I'd like to know if
> it might.)

What do you mean by "neutral"?

> - The secdir review [1] raised an issue and some
> changes were proposed for a -12 version that hasn't
> yet popped out (which is fine). This is just to note
> that to decrease the probability we forget:-)
>
>     [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05900.html

I do think that a pointer to RFC 7564 (especially §12.5) would be helpful.

Peter