[precis] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-precis-7613bis-08: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 05 July 2017 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: precis@ietf.org
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8874F1319E8; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 13:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-precis-7613bis@ietf.org, Marc Blanchet <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.ca>, precis-chairs@ietf.org, Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.ca, precis@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.55.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149928511354.13530.16384868318840634986.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 13:05:13 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/ffiT4Eot_e56efsrOAJ12JrPqME>
Subject: [precis] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-precis-7613bis-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 20:05:13 -0000

Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-precis-7613bis-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-precis-7613bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with jsalowey's point about discouraging raw password comparison. Can
you do something about that?

The use of "false positive" is confusing because positive can either mean
"accept" or "reject". I would use "false accept" or "false reject" or some
other clearer term