Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG

"Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Mon, 28 March 2016 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CCF12D53D for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CBdkG-HiaLMn for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33AB12D147 for <precis@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.111] (modemcable093.65-160-184.mc.videotron.ca [184.160.65.93]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31DE347760; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 15:28:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
To: "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 15:28:32 -0400
Message-ID: <E5D59850-BE7B-4AB9-863F-E883DA9C4E13@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <56F96A20.7030509@stpeter.im>
References: <20160301221928.17792.35793.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1C1668EA-1734-4D90-82E6-3894ECB6407C@viagenie.ca> <56D61E27.40000@stpeter.im> <56F96A20.7030509@stpeter.im>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_B208B31B-BF16-4734-B715-41B3D1BF17BC_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/oUUkNM3jbaxk9JsZ0JqUZUYErBQ>
Cc: precis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 19:28:36 -0000


On 28 Mar 2016, at 13:30, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> On 3/1/16 3:56 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 3/1/16 3:23 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
>>> hello,
>>>   we were thinking of closing the working group since the main 
>>> topics
>>> have been done and published as RFC. However, as some mailing list
>>> discussions require that some corrections to RFC 7564 and 7613 are
>>> needed, we added those two milestones to the charter. The intent is 
>>> when
>>> those are done, we would close the working group.
>>
>> Thanks, Marc. Here is my understanding of what needs to be done:
>>
>> In RFC 7564:
>>
>> 1. Change §5.2.3 to mention Unicode toLower() as an alternative to
>> Unicode Default Case Folding and describe the circumstances in which
>> toLower() is appropriate.
>>
>> 2. Change the order of operations in §7 from MUST to SHOULD (we've
>> already deviated from that slightly in RFC 7613 §3.2.1).
>>
>> 3. Clarify the meaning of 'preparation' (because it is different from
>> what stringprep meant by the term).
>>
>> In RFC 7613:
>>
>> a. Revisit Unicode Default Case Folding here, too.
>>
>> b. Modify the *presentation* (but not the content) of the rules for 
>> each
>> profile, along the lines of what we did in RFC 7700 (i.e., describe 
>> the
>> rules in one section and then use them in separate sections on
>> preparation, enforcement, and comparison).
>>
>> We'll also want to review and correct the errata that have been 
>> reported.
>>
>> I can commit to doing this work.
>
> FYI, I plan to submit -00 versions of the bis documents when the 
> submission window opens again on April 3.
>
> Marc, would you like me to submit these as individual I-Ds or WG I-Ds? 
> (They would be draft-[ietf|saintandre]-rfc[7564|7613|7700]-bis-00.)

I’m sure that the wg is likely to be ok with wg drafts, but let’s do 
the normal process. Please submit first as individual draft and we will 
call later for wg adoption.

Marc.


>
> Peter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> precis mailing list
> precis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis