Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG

On 28 Mar 2016, at 13:30, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> On 3/1/16 3:56 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 3/1/16 3:23 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
>>> hello,
>>>   we were thinking of closing the working group since the main 
>>> topics
>>> have been done and published as RFC. However, as some mailing list
>>> discussions require that some corrections to RFC 7564 and 7613 are
>>> needed, we added those two milestones to the charter. The intent is 
>>> when
>>> those are done, we would close the working group.
>>
>> Thanks, Marc. Here is my understanding of what needs to be done:
>>
>> In RFC 7564:
>>
>> 1. Change §5.2.3 to mention Unicode toLower() as an alternative to
>> Unicode Default Case Folding and describe the circumstances in which
>> toLower() is appropriate.
>>
>> 2. Change the order of operations in §7 from MUST to SHOULD (we've
>> already deviated from that slightly in RFC 7613 §3.2.1).
>>
>> 3. Clarify the meaning of 'preparation' (because it is different from
>> what stringprep meant by the term).
>>
>> In RFC 7613:
>>
>> a. Revisit Unicode Default Case Folding here, too.
>>
>> b. Modify the *presentation* (but not the content) of the rules for 
>> each
>> profile, along the lines of what we did in RFC 7700 (i.e., describe 
>> the
>> rules in one section and then use them in separate sections on
>> preparation, enforcement, and comparison).
>>
>> We'll also want to review and correct the errata that have been 
>> reported.
>>
>> I can commit to doing this work.
>
> FYI, I plan to submit -00 versions of the bis documents when the 
> submission window opens again on April 3.
>
> Marc, would you like me to submit these as individual I-Ds or WG I-Ds? 
> (They would be draft-[ietf|saintandre]-rfc[7564|7613|7700]-bis-00.)

I’m sure that the wg is likely to be ok with wg drafts, but let’s do 
the normal process. Please submit first as individual draft and we will 
call later for wg adoption.

Marc.

>
> Peter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> precis mailing list
> precis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis