Re: [precis] Milestones changed for precis WG

[Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>]

On 4/3/16 10:00 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>>>>>      I'm sure that the wg is likely to be ok with wg drafts, but
>>>>>      let's do the normal process. Please submit first as
>>>>>      individual draft and we will call later for wg adoption.
>>>>
>>>>    For whatever my opinion as a participant is worth, that would be
>>>>    meaningless, time-wasting, ritual for its own sake.
>>>
>>> disagree. the step from individual to wg is the normal process and has
>>> no impact on technical work: the technical work can continue whatever
>>> the filename is. Let’s spend time on technical discussions on the
>>> content of the to-be-published draft.
>>
>> I have no preference, but to be clear the -00 versions will be exactly what
>> is in the published RFCs so that we can more easily track changes.
>
> As AD for now, still, I'll say that I do have a preference, and a
> rather strong one: these are updates to documents the working group
> has already published.  The working group has already decided to
> update them.  Please just submit them as working group documents from
> the start.  Even going through motions here makes a statement that the
> working group is not working on what it agreed to work on.

-00 versions submitted.

These are as close as I could make the documents to the published RFCs. 
By the end of the week I will publish -01 versions incorporating the 
fixes previously outlined.

Peter