Re: [PMP] Printer MIB question

Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> Mon, 14 September 2009 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <pmp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-printmib-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-printmib-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5673A67E5 for <ietfarch-printmib-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.443
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.443 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.156, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xc-4ZvGBNNOH for <ietfarch-printmib-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6AA3A683D for <printmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76A97A009; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:33:35 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: pmp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: pmp@pwg.org
Received: from mail-bw0-f226.google.com (mail-bw0-f226.google.com [209.85.218.226]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2D579F62 for <pmp@pwg.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:33:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by bwz26 with SMTP id 26so2223734bwz.47 for <pmp@pwg.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eOrGdJ/7KjLwFs+kMmcckW9EjeyIw7Ik2ypE+sX+nFc=; b=scfjbGtEIze8Q7q8Z4schrHvyy0IuS/QL9Nj0YxPY3k36ceO1jpFnfeXcEMKtRJG1S 1SZ3FB9owJzEDRVpIca+XPvJi0DCo9lC+OZq7SKqdZbUzJLuIpXEk7qlXL/TPrI5drgK WeSA1Q2teD+ztXcCNMF6Ht//Sgh7FHy0Kzebs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H+As71E2Xf9PCQF/5BVppJCUAclPUMiEmNufYrr/Q6FytnnGoqiyVQclrWQQmDyeHX zYoQPIL7HXCWN9LfmtJVu/y9rd61EV5Yjl8d/LrrlirhOCAhAIllft8HI5bt/PN9Y+G0 UEHHx4A4Yl3p+xorlD8rEpiE+eZ3VDCnhJbW8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.153.27 with SMTP id i27mr5548591bkw.155.1252964001583; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e395be80909141221x3ccaadcbu492cfd10a9226270@mail.gmail.com>
References: <002e01ca355e$db4c7760$91e56620$@net> <89C42F572C9E5341890080C057ED44F1013D1D0A@ef-srv-01.euroform.local> <e395be80909141221x3ccaadcbu492cfd10a9226270@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:33:21 -0400
Message-ID: <e395be80909141433n2aa78f4bq6ba03f3b27eef467@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PMP] Printer MIB question
From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
To: Christian Christiansen <cc@euroform.dk>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
Cc: pmp@pwg.org, farouk.boujnah@gmail.com
X-BeenThere: pmp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Printer MIB <pmp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pmp>, <mailto:pmp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/archives/pmp>
List-Post: <mailto:pmp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pmp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pmp>, <mailto:pmp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pmp-bounces@pwg.org
Errors-To: pmp-bounces@pwg.org
X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: E76A97A009.A83C2
X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pmp-bounces@pwg.org

Hi,

EEK - actually 0x0004 is bit 13 as Bill said originally
(not bit 14 as I miscounted), i.e., inputTrayEmpty.

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
email: blueroofmusic@gmail.com
winter:
  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176
  734-944-0094
summer:
  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
  906-494-2434



On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> No - Bill Wagner had it right in his original reply.
>
> Right after Bill's previous quotation, RFC2790 says:
>
>  "Bits are numbered starting with the most significant
>  bit of the first byte being bit 0, the least significant bit
>  of the first byte being bit 7, the most significant bit of
>  the second byte being bit 8..."
>
> Read the above carefully!
>
> Bit 0 (0x8000) and bit 14 (0x0004) are set.
>
> Cheers,
> - Ira (co-editor of Printer MIB v2, RFC 3805)
>
> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
> Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
> email: blueroofmusic@gmail.com
> winter:
>  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176
>  734-944-0094
> summer:
>  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
>  906-494-2434
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Christian Christiansen <cc@euroform.dk> wrote:
>> If the endian is correct then, the value 8004 has a binary representation as
>> follows:
>>
>> 1000 0000 0000 0100
>>
>> That means to me that bit 15 is on and bit 2 is on. However bit 15 is NOT
>> defined in RFC2790
>>
>> So the interpretation would be
>>
>> “LowToner”
>>
>>
>>
>> If the endian is wrong the the value is 0480 and it has a binary
>> representation as follows:
>>
>> 0000 0100 1000 0000
>>
>> That means to me that bit 10 is on and bit 7 is on.
>>
>> In this case the interpretation would be
>>
>> “serviceRequested”
>>
>> “markerSupplyMissing”
>>
>>
>>
>> Christian Christiansen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: pmp-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pmp-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of William
>> Wagner
>> Sent: 14. september 2009 19:15
>> To: farouk.boujnah@gmail.com
>> Cc: pmp@pwg.org
>> Subject: [PMP] Printer MIB question
>>
>>
>>
>> With regard to the question that you sent to hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com,
>> szilles@mv.us.adobe.com, don@lexmark.com, jgyllens@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com, it
>> has been forwarded to the Printer Working Group “PMP” mail list, which deals
>> with printer MIB issues. You may well have responses from other members, but
>> if I understand your question, it is how to interpret the response to  OID
>> [.iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.5.1.2.1]. This appears to be the
>> hrPrinterDetectedErrorState object in the host resources MIB (RFC2790.) The
>> object value is “bit coded” as follows, and your program is interpreting the
>> response in hexadecimal.
>>
>>    lowPaper              0
>>
>>    noPaper               1
>>
>>                 lowToner              2
>>
>>                 noToner               3
>>
>>                 doorOpen              4
>>
>>                 jammed                5
>>
>>                 offline               6
>>
>>                 serviceRequested      7
>>
>>                 inputTrayMissing      8
>>
>>                 outputTrayMissing     9
>>
>>                 markerSupplyMissing  10
>>
>>                 outputNearFull       11
>>
>>                 outputFull           12
>>
>>                 inputTrayEmpty       13
>>
>>                 overduePreventMaint  14
>>
>>
>>
>> But remember that, in the MIB, bits are numbered starting with the most
>> significant bit of the first byte being bit 0,
>>
>>
>>
>> To interpret 80 04, it may be easiest conceptually to covert the value to
>> binary 1000 0000 0000 0100. The value read therefore corresponds to bits 0
>> and bit 13, low paper and input tray empty.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hope this helps. Note also that the current Printer MIB is RFC3805, although
>> some printers still support only the earlier verson.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bill Wagner/ Chair, Printer Working Group WIMS/PMP
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
>> pmp mailing list
>> pmp@pwg.org
>> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pmp
>>
>>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
pmp mailing list
pmp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pmp