[Privacy-pass] Centralization task in the Privacy Pass charter
mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com Thu, 14 January 2021 17:47 UTC
Return-Path: <mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com>
X-Original-To: privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB553A0D05 for <privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:47:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=internetpolicyadvisors.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2f_I0mVMPDBr for <privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:47:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from quail.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (quail.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6053A0B34 for <Privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:47:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7392436098A for <Privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:47:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-8-111.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.8.111]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6B3D9362302 for <Privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:47:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/6.0.1); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:47:24 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Reaction-Invention: 4286b2460c2e2bd2_1610646444270_2350728240
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1610646444270:230994548
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1610646444270
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6387F29C for <Privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:47:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d= internetpolicyadvisors.com; h=reply-to:from:to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=internetpolicyadvisors.com; bh=jNYuprjKuuynYI9IcLMQq3jX/gw=; b= JDIqlKdc288II6QYi9aLZ/U53CTmxzOHCjZnr3oAPFSMFeaWeSckGzwF2IE/fH0V 0YaLcSCnhPHYGMwoYlHGOCkzXkTcgfTW8J02TBG0ww/t8VA3Z24RHQ37/NMzMjxM v4AOJojTixYJrMTd0L8HgqUYIsFyZD+egdx/c+t/LkQ=
Received: from Kahlo (047-034-059-016.res.spectrum.com [47.34.59.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3C0082455 for <Privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:47:22 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a48
From: mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com
To: Privacy-pass@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:47:21 -0600
Organization: internet policy advisors
Message-ID: <036c01d6ea9d$50462e30$f0d28a90$@internetpolicyadvisors.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdbqnUAbp2huxofjSMSjMtP/78JO/g==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/privacy-pass/385pTd7SbZ-x75PGSjKpbzIxMks>
Subject: [Privacy-pass] Centralization task in the Privacy Pass charter
X-BeenThere: privacy-pass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <privacy-pass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/privacy-pass>, <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/privacy-pass/>
List-Post: <mailto:privacy-pass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass>, <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:47:30 -0000
All: In the Privacy Pass charter one of the deliverables is: Risk assessment for centralization in Privacy Pass deployments for multiple design options - February 2021 Ive drafted an I-D that is a first attempt to address that deliverable: A new version of I-D, draft-mcfadden-pp-centralization-problem-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Mark McFadden and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-mcfadden-pp-centralization-problem Revision: 00 Title: Privacy Pass: Centralization Problem Statement Document date: 2020-11-02 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 8 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mcfadden-pp-centralization-problem-00. txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcfadden-pp-centralization-problem/ Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mcfadden-pp-centralization-probl em Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mcfadden-pp-centralization-problem-00 Abstract: This document discusses the problems and mitigations associated with strict upper bounds on the number of Privacy Pass servers in the proposed Privacy Pass ecosystem. It documents a proposed problem statement. Naturally, Id welcome any comments and suggestions for improvement. mark Mark McFadden CTO internet policy advisors llc