Re: [Privacy-pass] WG Adoption

[Christopher Wood <[e-mail]>]

Yep, this is something we’re seeking to expand upon in the next iteration of the architecture draft. We will submit an updated version of that document for review (and discussion if necessary) at IETF 113.

Best,
Chris

> On Feb 18, 2022, at 5:55 PM, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Totally agreed about expanding on the trust relationships in the different deployments models. I was talking to the authors of the architecture doc, and I think there’s agreement that this discussion belongs there.
> 
> Best,
> Tommy 
> 
>> On Feb 18, 2022, at 12:48 PM, Mark McFadden <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I support adoption as well.
>> Once the draft is adopted I hope a section can be added, either separately or in the Security Considerations, about the trust relationships between the actors in the architecture draft. There was some good explanations during the interim about the roles and what the trust relationships were between the actors in the architecture: it would be good to have that added to the draft.
>> 
>> mark
>> 
>> -- 
>> Mark McFadden
>> CTO 
>> internet policy advisors, llc
>> [phone] | [phone]
>> [e-mail]
>> -- 
>> Privacy-pass mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass
> -- 
> Privacy-pass mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass