Re: [Privacy-pass] The PRIVACYPASS WG has placed draft-group-privacypass-consistency-mirror in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

[Watson Ladd <[e-mail]>]

Apologies for the late reply.

It seems that this is a fine instantiation of a pull based model, and
that's what the underlying draft-ietf-privacypass-key-consistency
discusses in its architecture. I do wonder if a push or polling based
model akin to e.g. Usenet might be a better fit for a consistent
broadcast medium. If we do think the pull based model is what's
needed, then we should adopt.

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 1:39 PM Ben Schwartz
<bemasc=[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> We are opening a two-week Call for Adoption (ending Friday, December 15th) for "Checking Resource Consistency with HTTP Mirrors".
>
> Please comment in this thread with your view as to whether this document should be adopted by the PRIVACYPASS working group.
>
> --Ben Schwartz, for the chairs.
> ________________________________
> From: Privacy-pass <[e-mail]> on behalf of IETF Secretariat <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 4:07 PM
> To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> Subject: [Privacy-pass] The PRIVACYPASS WG has placed draft-group-privacypass-consistency-mirror in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
>
> !-------------------------------------------------------------------|
>   This Message Is From an External Sender
>
> |-------------------------------------------------------------------!
>
>
> The PRIVACYPASS WG has placed draft-group-privacypass-consistency-mirror in
> state Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Benjamin Schwartz)
>
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-group-privacypass-consistency-mirror/
>
>
> --
> Privacy-pass mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass
> --
> Privacy-pass mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass



-- 
Astra mortemque praestare gradatim