[privacydir] Fwd: [siprec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-siprec-req-09.txt> (Use Cases and Requirements for SIP-based Media Recording (SIPREC)) to Informational RFC

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Wed, 06 April 2011 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: privacydir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: privacydir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B295E28C0F6 for <privacydir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CDMjGAggV+-0 for <privacydir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F733A69CD for <privacydir@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=1961; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1302105016; x=1303314616; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:references: to:message-id:mime-version; bh=LMv5v/TiIBqwhfDea72l5wksVXur+BRuE1IcI/lBYHo=; b=e2h8TNZbxwTIk5cNHxdV9bc3zgVT2QokRQfaGCoDPpywdJAP7rp9mSMc hVLDg7yyAUoMCv0hqlg5KBRojFWK352zgxrn6j6NDJZdCTlLUqUlw4GYD zIgkUoRBbZdkgxvBWq2oPjnI/iBw/7tYldzL72Rcp6xUnFdyAc2NQJePW Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIIAEKLnE2rRDoG/2dsb2JhbACYbI0Md4h5nCOcRYVsBIVOh26DYw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,311,1299456000"; d="scan'208";a="331825154"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2011 15:50:15 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.100] (rcdn-fluffy-8712.cisco.com [10.99.9.19]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p36FoFfJ017577 for <privacydir@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:50:15 GMT
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:53:28 -0600
References: <20110406125020.17538.70016.idtracker@localhost>
To: privacydir@ietf.org
Message-Id: <5F626EDA-0746-43AB-AAA5-2F7B87B21D6A@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: [privacydir] Fwd: [siprec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-siprec-req-09.txt> (Use Cases and Requirements for SIP-based Media Recording (SIPREC)) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: privacydir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Privacy Directorate to develop the concept of privacy considerations for IETF specifications and to review internet-drafts for privacy considerations." <privacydir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacydir>, <mailto:privacydir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/privacydir>
List-Post: <mailto:privacydir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:privacydir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacydir>, <mailto:privacydir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:48:57 -0000

I think this draft deserves a careful review from someone on the privacy directorate that has not been too involved. A key thing to know is that when this WG was chartered, we agreed to the charter text 

  The
  working group will make sure that any protocol specified addresses these
  concerns and includes mechanisms to alert users to the fact that a
  session they are participating in is being recorded.

The choice of the word "users" was driven around all users in the session need to know, not just one end of the call. 


Begin forwarded message:

> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> Date: April 6, 2011 6:50:20 AM MDT
> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> Cc: siprec@ietf.org
> Subject: [siprec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-siprec-req-09.txt> (Use Cases and Requirements	for SIP-based Media Recording (SIPREC)) to Informational RFC
> Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
> 
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the SIP Recording WG (siprec) to
> consider the following document:
> - 'Use Cases and Requirements for SIP-based Media Recording (SIPREC)'
>  <draft-ietf-siprec-req-09.txt> as an Informational RFC
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-04-20. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-siprec-req/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-siprec-req/
> 
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> _______________________________________________
> siprec mailing list
> siprec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec