[privacydir] Fwd: [siprec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-siprec-req-09.txt> (Use Cases and Requirements for SIP-based Media Recording (SIPREC)) to Informational RFC

I think this draft deserves a careful review from someone on the privacy directorate that has not been too involved. A key thing to know is that when this WG was chartered, we agreed to the charter text 

  The
  working group will make sure that any protocol specified addresses these
  concerns and includes mechanisms to alert users to the fact that a
  session they are participating in is being recorded.

The choice of the word "users" was driven around all users in the session need to know, not just one end of the call. 

Begin forwarded message:

> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> Date: April 6, 2011 6:50:20 AM MDT
> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> Cc: siprec@ietf.org
> Subject: [siprec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-siprec-req-09.txt> (Use Cases and Requirements	for SIP-based Media Recording (SIPREC)) to Informational RFC
> Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
> 
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the SIP Recording WG (siprec) to
> consider the following document:
> - 'Use Cases and Requirements for SIP-based Media Recording (SIPREC)'
>  <draft-ietf-siprec-req-09.txt> as an Informational RFC
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-04-20. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-siprec-req/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-siprec-req/
> 
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> _______________________________________________
> siprec mailing list
> siprec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec