Re: [privacydir] SAVI drafts...

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Lucy,

I appreciate it,
S.

On 17/05/11 15:55, Lucy Lynch wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2011, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> I can do reviews of the threat doc and the framework as well -
> will be less technical, more ops and nits from me.
> 
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Can we get a couple more reviewers? SAVI is a WG with a *lot*
>> of potential privacy issues so I'm a bit disappointed that
>> we've only gotten one reviewer. If people aren't willing to
>> jump for that then I'd have to wonder how effective this
>> directorate will be in its current form. (If you want do
>> discuss that feel free to start a separate thread, in the
>> meantime, just volunteer to review these:-)
>>
>> S.
>>
>> On 13/05/11 15:26, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>>
>>> That's great Richard thanks.
>>>
>>> S.
>>>
>>> On 13/05/11 14:51, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
>>>> I'll plan to do reviews of the threat document [2] and the framework
>>>> [4].
>>>> --Richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On May 13, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> The first SAVI [1] drafts [2,3] are on the next IESG
>>>>> telechat agenda on May 26th. There's also a framework
>>>>> document [4] that's in the publication requested
>>>>> state that'll presumably be coming along soon and
>>>>> might help with context for the others.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sean and I would like to get a review of these from the
>>>>> privacy directorate. If you're able to take one of these
>>>>> can you mail the list saying so. We'd like reviews by
>>>>> 2011-05-20 if possible. We'd like one or possibly two
>>>>> reviews of each document.
>>>>>
>>>>> Its probably best to handle this as for a secdir review
>>>>> (that is, cc the authors, wg-chairs, directorate and
>>>>> iesg) unless you'd rather just send to Sean and I for
>>>>> some reason and remember that the purpose of the review
>>>>> is to help the ADs with evaluating the privacy aspects
>>>>> of these drafts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please include the following boiler plate to make it clear
>>>>> where the review is coming from:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Do not be alarmed.  I have reviewed this document as part
>>>>> of the privacy directorate's ongoing effort to some IETF
>>>>> documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were
>>>>> written primarily for the benefit of the security area
>>>>> directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
>>>>> comments just like any other review comments. "
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>> Stephen & Sean.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/wg/savi
>>>>> [2] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-savi-threat-scope/
>>>>> [3] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-savi-fcfs/
>>>>> [4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-savi-framework/
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> privacydir mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacydir
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> privacydir mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacydir
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> privacydir mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacydir
>>
>