[Privsec-discuss] Status checks

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Wed, 21 December 2016 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: privsec-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: privsec-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B311294DA for <privsec-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:45:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.301
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w6dyURvvelhd for <privsec-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:45:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-1.pexch112.icann.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 198C61294C7 for <privsec-discuss@iab.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:45:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ( by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:45:36 -0800
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:45:36 -0800
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: "privsec-discuss@iab.org" <privsec-discuss@iab.org>
Thread-Topic: Status checks
Thread-Index: AQHSW7pqzQsxhIZAAUKCrcc8iEt7YA==
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:45:36 +0000
Message-ID: <6B2CC97F-ACD3-4322-BA59-9079759A4C0A@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D9672E8B-4537-4366-A315-2FA5F8A37BA0"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/privsec-discuss/XLcPtkwlX834x4nkP5Xi0I7G5_k>
Subject: [Privsec-discuss] Status checks
X-BeenThere: privsec-discuss@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy and Security Discussion List <privsec-discuss.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/privsec-discuss>, <mailto:privsec-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/privsec-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:privsec-discuss@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:privsec-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/privsec-discuss>, <mailto:privsec-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:45:40 -0000


- What is the status of draft-iab-web-pki-problems? I have been told off-list that there was discussion about the disposition of draft on the members-only list, but have not heard anything on the public list. If the draft is still active, I would like to hear responses to the comments I sent in September.

- What is the status of this IAB project? Are there other documents we should be reviewing or contributing to in other ways?

--Paul Hoffman