Re: [Privsec-discuss] [Stackevo] Consolidation

"Aaron Falk" <aaron.falk@gmail.com> Mon, 02 October 2017 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: privsec-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: privsec-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2171348E9; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 14:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pnNnP6TkMsgp; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 14:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBF811348E3; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 14:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id w63so6694848qkd.10; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 14:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fa7SFH7DsZ43dMpinluSJnNKNg4QLreV1/Ie8BOI/H8=; b=EmSSFJtpl9V2TIJCsyA4fTdEmeZP/EiryTY4O4VD1xT7Fcdg6OFdidzAHV62j6uMlO TM00POrzWNp7NajMrQwCbu9e1UeDuiAOeSm53igHB9+mapQf3l8YESwI6ykSC6hFvzLJ on7FR9Hvcltz2Xja1JZSf8jGDKKy1j1uZ5HvbJBWEYufLz2sflwgJ2P6yRMwlCbHLiyF FVxCUmLX70WlnNsDhJEePEXtcb8a1lL+27ImO6HsDE2PDYagN2mxWFTwju/pCvATaDP+ CjzDqdV1kzDlZuTWe43YK6MjMzXQjOI7qjcdljMegpYfDZgBftqSrT30+t5wncQaC2A/ FYNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fa7SFH7DsZ43dMpinluSJnNKNg4QLreV1/Ie8BOI/H8=; b=XNu98CorPs6SM3xiNRqszh1lUTFoegCTKuGE9GgAEJ8PzyEgkFDw7DG9UIfWSJ1+OK 9uy/tHuWK/IOrjuB57aTTuMu/dZuPSmRJi0I4pxFQma7KucQ2dL+xcaFE+Fd7RP8jYYa 7AxI6cNz+pQ3Pd9Sfr5dCQxv2BbUMIw0f390bSZqLIGSxlMRAfvs0n11btYSav/OOvs7 JaaU8x6xbWkCyNakrtIFBBmHpQsxZSkpsY8aTv5I4aCFAuXPuVq/lR3RBrxHoIzSD+Vt 2uBpIq2Bm1Av677eDE8U461xN+6+BUcTxk30awQz6s5Yk+ltdGqZgnsRBc8xuVSJF1ag 0zcA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXxPeeR2655sYHYuZt9CwxiqG0XOfMnz9ND6Jk06zHZqEiWJNKd jTe5VzzKEjT+DzPcW6f7jFMFh49G
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBsBMCt64+cmo6af+Ts/mPKsXywzW1zh2UoBRw5Cl6QT5Io0Vtf+DZ06xNCdBdN8HH+cfEhBQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.15.65 with SMTP id z62mr17598033qkg.2.1506981205676; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 14:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.19.37.102] ([72.246.0.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g131sm7406402qkb.15.2017.10.02.14.53.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Oct 2017 14:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Aaron Falk" <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
To: "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Cc: "IANA Strategy" <iana-strategy@iab.org>, Stackevo <stackevo@iab.org>, tech-plenary@iab.org, privsec-discuss@iab.org, IAB <iab@iab.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 17:53:22 -0400
Message-ID: <B43AB5A3-481E-4936-850A-530445656D34@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C520880D-668F-4D46-BF46-0796D60877F1@piuha.net>
References: <3F737F0E-9834-4469-9DB6-5EE392E96C2C@piuha.net> <C520880D-668F-4D46-BF46-0796D60877F1@piuha.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; markup=markdown
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.7r5419)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/privsec-discuss/m0ZLmwvdprUlWc6sh9wGCjKzHsw>
Subject: Re: [Privsec-discuss] [Stackevo] Consolidation
X-BeenThere: privsec-discuss@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy and Security Discussion List <privsec-discuss.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/privsec-discuss>, <mailto:privsec-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/privsec-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:privsec-discuss@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:privsec-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/privsec-discuss>, <mailto:privsec-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 21:53:28 -0000

Thanks for a provocative question!

On 29 Sep 2017, at 6:00, Jari Arkko wrote:

> So, do the folks in the different programs have advice to the IAB in 
> this topic? In particular:
>
> 1\. Do you see architectural issues within your own field that relates 
> to consolidation trends, and how those affect the Internet?
>

I’ll noodle on this but a question that comes to mind is since the 
Internet has consolidated nearly all other (public) data networks, I 
wonder how hard it would be to restore the major distributed systems 
services (e.g., electrical, BGP, DNS) service if some major subset of 
the network was unexpectedly brought offline.  I worry we have hidden 
dependencies and the only way to expose them is to test a large scale 
reboot.


> 2\. What potential new architectural structures might provide support 
> to either fighting the consolidation trend, or accelerating it?

When I started at Akamai I was stunned at the volume of traffic 
generated by CDN servers as proxies for the major global content 
providers and the trend has continued.  The large CDN footprint has 
found additional utility expanding the attach surface for clients.  I 
believe both of these have been good for creating a sense of 
dependability and high performance in the minds of many Internet users 
and is a good thing.  I wonder if the idea of large scale (commercial) 
proxies can be extended elsewhere.

>
> 3\. Are there research programs that you believe would be useful in 
> this space, but are currently not being pursued? Which ones?

Thinking…

—aaron