RE: [proto-team] Fwd: Question for draft shepherd's questionnaire?

"Mankin, Allison J" <amankin@nsf.gov> Mon, 16 July 2007 19:52 UTC

Return-path: <proto-team-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IAWct-0003QS-Uu; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:52:59 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IAWcs-0003KL-Fb for proto-team@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:52:58 -0400
Received: from aquila.nsf.gov ([198.181.231.25]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IAWca-0001i2-Jg for proto-team@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:52:58 -0400
Received: from nsf-fe-02.nsf.gov (HELO nsf-fe-02.ad.nsf.gov) ([128.150.4.152]) by aquila.nsf.gov with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2007 15:52:08 -0400
X-SBRS: None
Received: from NSF-BE-03.ad.nsf.gov ([128.150.130.227]) by nsf-fe-02.ad.nsf.gov with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:52:29 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [proto-team] Fwd: Question for draft shepherd's questionnaire?
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:52:28 -0400
Message-ID: <3E387C1C64088E499E7BF0E86B0E1BF7F85C21@NSF-BE-03.ad.nsf.gov>
In-Reply-To: <469B6E75.2030108@piuha.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [proto-team] Fwd: Question for draft shepherd's questionnaire?
Thread-Index: AcfHqzyQPzPzGJ4zSA+YSS5fnMFY2wANko2g
References: <468767D7.7020603@uninett.no> <410A74D2-C452-47E5-952A-C41F9B107777@nokia.com><D98FA723-25AF-47D8-9B13-9828B5FA926A@nokia.com> <4694EE59.3090905@levkowetz.com> <3E387C1C64088E499E7BF0E86B0E1BF7F85BFD@NSF-BE-03.ad.nsf.gov> <05D8CB2B-C98B-4822-A633-00C6E5C57AFC@nokia.com> <E764BA50-5D5D-4264-BC37-96044BA258A3@nokia.com> <469B6578.3010700@piuha.net> <B5DA7FD6-123B-4227-A7CF-3708360A0AE6@nokia.com> <469B6E75.2030108@piuha.net>
From: "Mankin, Allison J" <amankin@nsf.gov>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jul 2007 19:52:29.0382 (UTC) FILETIME=[D7684660:01C7C7E2]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aafa0432175920a4b3e118e16c5cb64
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, proto-team@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: proto-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process and Tools Team <proto-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>, <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:proto-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>, <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org

 
Jari,

Where do the WG Chairs find the information?  We need both the Ads and
the Chairs to find the questionnaire, both easily.  The Chairs have
fewer educational and reinforcement mechanisms than the Ads - the Ads
have their calls, their IESG Chair, the secretariat, lots of ways to be
helped in finding a consistent copy of the questionnaire, and they
aren't even the ones who have to fill it out!

As a further consideration, the WG Chairs (and the IETF participants)
need the questionnaire to stay consistent, because it needs to be
applied to all the documents the same way.  If the questionnaire is
maintained in several places, it will become inconsistent (when I was AD
we had experience with several resources like this).  

So, I believe it would be best for the questionnaire to have the same
availability and maintenance situation as id-nits - that is now an ION
and I believe that Ads, Chairs and IETFers all know how to find it and
work with it.

What do you think of my considerations about this?

Allison

-----Original Message-----
From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net] 
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 9:11 AM
To: Lars Eggert
Cc: Mankin, Allison J; Henrik Levkowetz; Russ Housley;
proto-team@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [proto-team] Fwd: Question for draft shepherd's
questionnaire?


> In other words: don't put the template into an ION, use the web page?

Yes. Or at least not only in an ION...

> Works for me.
>
> (But then I'd like to be able to modify that web page directly, 
> without needing to corner someone that has write access there.)

The approvals and modification process is a separate issue from how this
looks to the end user. If you want, we could still require that the web
page is not updated unless the ION or the RFC is. Or we could update the
web page as is needed, by some designated responsible person.

The IESG web page access should be available to whoever AD wants to
figure out how to do it... I have not yet. I suspect this needs
subversion usage, and I have not used it before.

Jari

_______________________________________________
proto-team mailing list
proto-team@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team