Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding attached

[Lars Eggert <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

On Jun 9, 2006, at 16:28, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>   I'm of course biased, having suggested the changes, but I find that
> to me it seems that the document reads much more smoothly now.  Maybe
> that's the reason why I found more stuff...

No problem.

> 	s/perhaps you he or she/perhaps he or she/

OK

> One question for clarification: In the current revision, the "Document
> Shepherd Write-up" seems to be defined as what's covered under 1.i,  
> and
> presumably the "Document Shepherd Questionnaire" is the whole of the
> (1.a)..(1.i) set of questions.  It seems to me that in some places the
> document mentions the Document Shepherd Write-up where intention is to
> talk about talk about both questionaire and (1.i) write-up;

Actually, I tried to remove the distinction between write-up and  
questionnaire, because the terms weren't used consistently, and just  
call the whole set of questions write-up.

I missed two instances of the term questionnaire. If I change those  
to write-up, will this be OK? Or do you want to go through the  
document and look at all places where the write-up is mentioned and  
check which term should be used?

Lars
-- 
Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories

_______________________________________________
proto-team mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team