[proto-team] Fwd: Question for draft shepherd's questionnaire?

FYI, there was a suggestion to add an item to the questionnaire. What  
do folks think?

How are we maintaining the questionnaire? Should I start a rfc4858bis  
document?

Begin forwarded message:
> From: "ext Stig Venaas" <stig.venaas@uninett.no>
> Date: July 1, 2007 11:37:43 GMT+03:00
> To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
> Cc: ext Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>, Jari Arkko  
> <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
> Subject: Re: Question for draft shepherd's questionnaire?
>
> Lars Eggert wrote:
>> On 2007-6-29, at 14:51, ext Ralph Droms wrote:
>>> "Does this Internet Draft propose any extensions to the operation  
>>> or capabilities of any other protocols such as IPv6 (extension  
>>> headers), ICMP, Diameter, RADIUS, DNS or DHCP?  Does this  
>>> Internet Draft require that IANA assign any protocol numbers that  
>>> require review by another individual or review body outside the  
>>> submitting working group?"
>> We might consider adding a sentence to (1.c) on this issue. Maybe:
>>    (1.c)  Does the Document Shepherd have concerns that the document
>>           needs more review from a particular or broader perspective,
>>           e.g., security, operational complexity, someone familiar  
>> with
>>           AAA, internationalization, or XML?
>> NEW:
>>           If the document extends or makes requirements on a protocol
>>           that originated in another WG or area, has that group
>>           reviewed that the document conforms to any established  
>> protocol
>>           maintenance process and that it does not conflict with
>>           chartered or planned work?
>
> Adding this would be great,
>
> Stig

[proto-team] Fwd: Question for draft shepherd's questionnaire?

Attachment: smime.p7s