Re: [proto-team] Re: Adding IETF tracker support for IAB and IRTF document shepherds

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:54:19AM -0700, Allison Mankin wrote:
> 
> Dave,
> 
> You're reading the notation well.  Good catch.  That state
> transition is absolutely needed - we just missed putting it in.
> We'll update asap in a version d on
> http://www1.tools.ietf.org/wg/proto/draft-ietf-proto-iab-irtf-tracker-ext/

	Thnx,

	--dmm


> 
> Allison
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 	Quick question on section 2.1:
> > 
> > 	It looks like the only transitions (Possible next states)
> > 	available from the "Active IAB Document" state are
> > 	"Parked IAB Document", "Dead". Seems like we should be
> > 	able to transition to "In IAB Internal Last Call" from
> > 	"Active IAB Document". 
> >
> > 	This is on the theory that a succesful IAB document would
> > 	(roughly) follow the following states (with attendant
> > 	poor ascii drawing; "permitted substates in the states
> > 	following  "Active IAB Document" are shorthand for the
> > 	first one; i.e., you can iterate around in the permitted
> > 	substates; there are other transitions too, as you note):
> > 
> > 
> >                                              +---------------+
> >                                              |               |
> >                                             \|/              |
> > 	 Active IAB Document --------> permitted substates --+
> >                                              |
> >                                              |
> >                 +----------------------------+
> >                 |
> >                 |
> >                 |
> >                \|/                          
> >          In IAB Internal Last Call --> permitted substates ---+
> >                                                               |
> >                 +---------------------------------------------+
> >                 |
> >                \|/
> >          In IAB Community Review   --> permitted substates ---+
> >                                                               |
> >                 +---------------------------------------------+
> >                 |
> >                \|/
> > 	 RFC Ed Queue
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 	Or am I not understanding the notation used section 2.1?
> > 
> > 	Thanks,
> > 
> > 	--dmm
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> proto-team mailing list
> proto-team@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team