Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding attached
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de> Fri, 09 June 2006 07:15 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1FobDI-0007lu-UF; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 03:15:24 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FobDB-0007gj-JD
for proto-team@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 03:15:17 -0400
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.40])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FobDA-00036g-59
for proto-team@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 03:15:17 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B5820001B8
for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:15:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (atlas1.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 08064-07 for <proto-team@ietf.org>;
Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:15:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from venus.office (europa.netlab.nec.de [10.1.1.25])
by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92F420001B6
for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:15:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from n-eggert.office ([10.1.1.112]) by venus.office over TLS secured
channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:15:15 +0200
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by n-eggert.office (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAEA10B506
for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:15:16 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
In-Reply-To: <448879B6.9040703@levkowetz.com>
References: <D27342A1-3CD2-483F-B031-37690568B927@netlab.nec.de> <20060607140952.GA2437@1-4-5.net>
<6FF50059-B88A-44C3-B586-63B6A040F7FD@netlab.nec.de>
<448879B6.9040703@levkowetz.com>
Message-Id: <C60A11A6-029B-45CC-B54D-6C7E7177F6A2@netlab.nec.de>
Cc: proto-team@ietf.org
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>
Subject: Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding
attached
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:15:15 +0200
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jun 2006 07:15:15.0015 (UTC)
FILETIME=[745A8D70:01C68B94]
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas1.office)
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 825e642946eda55cd9bc654a36dab8c2
X-BeenThere: proto-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process and Tools Team <proto-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>,
<mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:proto-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>,
<mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0767516061=="
Errors-To: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, On Jun 8, 2006, at 21:25, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > > You've put quite a bit of work into this, I see. Overall I like it, > but I have one major disagreement: > > I'm not especially thrilled with the elevation of "PROTO" from > something associated with the PROTO team to a term > specifically > for this process improvement. The previous version of the > document didn't go as far as this goes, and I'd rather see us > move from reference to the 'PROTO' process to simply 'the > Shepherding process' or 'the Document Shepherding process'. I didn't make that change - that has been there for a while (see the abstracts of -06 and -05). I'm completely fine with changing to one of your proposed terms. > In line with this, I'd propose to change any reference to > PROTO Write-Up to 'Document Shepherd Write-Up' throughout the > document. Also OK. > Lesser comments: Agree with all of them, will make the edits. Lars -- Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories
_______________________________________________ proto-team mailing list proto-team@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team
- [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgchair… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… David Meyer
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Allison Mankin
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Allison Mankin
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Allison Mankin
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert