Re: [proto-team] Re: Adding IETF tracker support for IAB and IRTF document shepherds

Hi,

on 2006-05-10 17:54 Allison Mankin said the following:
> Dave,
> 
> You're reading the notation well.  Good catch.  That state
> transition is absolutely needed - we just missed putting it in.
> We'll update asap in a version d on
> http://www1.tools.ietf.org/wg/proto/draft-ietf-proto-iab-irtf-tracker-ext/

Too late for a version d, since -00 has been submitted.  The fix
is applied in -01.a, available from the URL above.

Regards,

	Henrik

> Allison
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 	Quick question on section 2.1:
>> 
>> 	It looks like the only transitions (Possible next states)
>> 	available from the "Active IAB Document" state are
>> 	"Parked IAB Document", "Dead". Seems like we should be
>> 	able to transition to "In IAB Internal Last Call" from
>> 	"Active IAB Document". 
>>
>> 	This is on the theory that a succesful IAB document would
>> 	(roughly) follow the following states (with attendant
>> 	poor ascii drawing; "permitted substates in the states
>> 	following  "Active IAB Document" are shorthand for the
>> 	first one; i.e., you can iterate around in the permitted
>> 	substates; there are other transitions too, as you note):
>> 
>> 
>>                                              +---------------+
>>                                              |               |
>>                                             \|/              |
>> 	 Active IAB Document --------> permitted substates --+
>>                                              |
>>                                              |
>>                 +----------------------------+
>>                 |
>>                 |
>>                 |
>>                \|/                          
>>          In IAB Internal Last Call --> permitted substates ---+
>>                                                               |
>>                 +---------------------------------------------+
>>                 |
>>                \|/
>>          In IAB Community Review   --> permitted substates ---+
>>                                                               |
>>                 +---------------------------------------------+
>>                 |
>>                \|/
>> 	 RFC Ed Queue
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 	Or am I not understanding the notation used section 2.1?
>> 
>> 	Thanks,
>> 
>> 	--dmm
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> proto-team mailing list
> proto-team@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team
> 

Re: [proto-team] Re: Adding IETF tracker support for IAB and IRTF document shepherds

Attachment: signature.asc