[proto-team] comments on draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-tracker-ext-00.txt
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de> Wed, 07 June 2006 12:02 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1FnwkP-0004tP-SV; Wed, 07 Jun 2006 08:02:53 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FnwkO-0004tE-PQ
for proto-team@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2006 08:02:52 -0400
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.40])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FnwkM-00014c-Ah
for proto-team@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2006 08:02:52 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F030C2009081
for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:03:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (atlas1.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 27848-04 for <proto-team@ietf.org>;
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:03:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from venus.office (europa.netlab.nec.de [10.1.1.25])
by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DE620001B8
for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:03:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from n-eggert.office ([10.1.1.112]) by venus.office over TLS secured
channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:02:49 +0200
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by n-eggert.office (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7048B109D30
for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:02:50 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
To: proto-team@ietf.org
Message-Id: <11E50859-B94C-484F-96AD-680668C94D0E@netlab.nec.de>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:02:47 +0200
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jun 2006 12:02:49.0456 (UTC)
FILETIME=[4BF9CF00:01C68A2A]
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas1.office)
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2086112c730e13d5955355df27e3074b
Subject: [proto-team] comments on draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-tracker-ext-00.txt
X-BeenThere: proto-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process and Tools Team <proto-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>,
<mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:proto-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>,
<mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1791921863=="
Errors-To: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org
Nice document overall.
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 13:
> This document describes the changes required to make it
possible for
> working group chairs to update the I-D tracker during document
> shepherding, after the request for publication. It also describes
> additional requirements for the chairs to use the I-D tracker for
> managing WG documents from their earliest stages. Having the
tracker
> support the working groups more fully is a primary benefit, but in
> addition, this moves towards the goal of providing an
integrated view
> of document states from -00 to RFC publication.
Note that I'm updating draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-
shepherding to
reflect that the chairs can appoint a WG secretary as document
shepherd, in consultation with the ADs. This document should
hence
differentiate between the roles of Document Shepherd and WG
Chair.
Section 3.1., paragraph 8:
> * Parked WG Document
> This document has lost its author or editor, is waiting for
> another document to be written, or cannot currently be
worked on
> by the working group for some other reason.
How about "Inactive WG Document" instead? As the opposite of
"Active WG Document?"
Lars
--
Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories
_______________________________________________ proto-team mailing list proto-team@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team