Re: [proto-team] I-D Tracker Extensions

Allison Mankin wrote:

>Brian,
>
>  
>
>>Allison Mankin wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Brian,
>>>
>>>Henrik and I have done a few iterations of this with
>>>Ray looking on, and as of yesterday Henrik is waiting for me 
>>>to look at  the last one before we send it to the PROTO team.
>>>      
>>>
>>Excellent. I just don't want this to slip down the queue for
>>lack of requirements.
>>    
>>
>
>I'll ask Ray to speak to this - Henrik and I put this on a fast track
>because Ray said this could be a high priority.  Are we still on
>track, Ray?  
>  
>
Yes, we are in the process of prioritizing NSS development work and this 
is a HiPri.
BTW the doc seems to define new states but not actions.  Is that to be 
left to NSS to determine?
Ray

>  
>
>>>We originally had a section in it on IAB and IRTF
>>>drafts - I've suggested it be a separate document which
>>>we should launch to those folks at the same time (Henrik?)
>>>because the IAB and IRTF/IRSG are likely to have to hash 
>>>their document state diagrams a bit and it would be nice
>>>not to have to wait for them for all the work.
>>>      
>>>
>>Well, OK, but it would be good to get it all done as one effort.
>>    
>>
>
>My comment said launch at the same time.
>
>Henrik, can we start up the second IAB/IRTF draft?  The final
>section of markup I gave on our first draft is fine for that
>short draft, and I can do a cut in there to refine it again, especially
>needing to fix up the IRTF part, based on Aaron's process doc.  
>I just think we need to run that doc in parallel.
>
>Allison
>
>  
>