[proto-team] Fwd: COMMENT: draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@avaya.com>
> Date: November 15, 2006 4:10:19 AM GMT+01:00
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> Cc: margaret@thingmagic.com, henrik@levkowetz.com, mankin@psg.com
> Subject: COMMENT: draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding
>
> Comment:
> 1. Section 3
>
> During IESG evaluation, following up on all IESG feedback  
> ("DISCUSS" and "COMMENT" items) related to the shepherded document,  
> as described in Section 3.3.
>
> Any reason not to include "ABSTAIN" contents as feedback?
>
> 2. Is there any reference for who is the Responsible Area Director?  
> Is this the same as WG Area Advisor?
>
> 3. In 2e I am slightly confused by the use of the construct  
> 'strongly RECOMMENDED'. I believe that we should not allow usage of  
> intermediate constructs between 2119 keywords and would recommend  
> to pick one of RECOMMENDED (with no strength marking) or MUST.
>
> 4. Section 6 - 'If the document shepherding process is not used,  
> the Responsible Area Director acts as Document Shepherd, just as he  
> or she did in the past.' - better say '... just as per the existing  
> procedures of shepherding by Area Directors.' (he or she may not  
> have been an AD in the past)
>
>

Lars
-- 
Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories

[proto-team] Fwd: COMMENT: draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding

Attachment: smime.p7s