Re: [proto-team] small issues with draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding-07

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de> Wed, 28 June 2006 12:05 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FvYnX-0002kq-Qs; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:05:35 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FvYnW-0002dH-9q for proto-team@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:05:34 -0400
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.40]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FvYnU-0001KH-SP for proto-team@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:05:34 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515C820031DC for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:05:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas1.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04687-10 for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:05:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from venus.office (europa.netlab.nec.de [10.1.1.25]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3341E20001B5 for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:05:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from n-eggert.office ([10.1.1.112]) by venus.office over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:05:31 +0200
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n-eggert.office (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D9912AF7E for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:05:31 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <44A16A34.8040903@levkowetz.com>
References: <35758337-E41C-4EFE-AABA-A10F499198BC@netlab.nec.de> <44A16A34.8040903@levkowetz.com>
Message-Id: <B411843A-0E47-434D-BB72-789268775307@netlab.nec.de>
Cc: proto-team@ietf.org
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>
Subject: Re: [proto-team] small issues with draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding-07
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:05:30 +0200
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2006 12:05:31.0928 (UTC) FILETIME=[277DD180:01C69AAB]
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas1.office)
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 14582b0692e7f70ce7111d04db3781c8
X-BeenThere: proto-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process and Tools Team <proto-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>, <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:proto-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>, <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1018324358=="
Errors-To: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org

On Jun 27, 2006, at 19:26, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> Overall the changes look good to me, except for the change in (2.g)
> and (3.f) where I prefer the old wording (..issues have been  
> resolved..)
> instead of ..issues are resolved..

OK, will undo those before submission.

Lars
-- 
Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories


_______________________________________________
proto-team mailing list
proto-team@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team