Re: [proto-team] I-D Tracker Extensions

> 
> 
> Allison Mankin wrote:
> 
> >Brian,
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Allison Mankin wrote:
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Brian,
> >>>
> >>>Henrik and I have done a few iterations of this with
> >>>Ray looking on, and as of yesterday Henrik is waiting for me 
> >>>to look at  the last one before we send it to the PROTO team.
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>Excellent. I just don't want this to slip down the queue for
> >>lack of requirements.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >I'll ask Ray to speak to this - Henrik and I put this on a fast track
> >because Ray said this could be a high priority.  Are we still on
> >track, Ray?  
> >  
> >
> Yes, we are in the process of prioritizing NSS development work and this 
> is a HiPri.
> BTW the doc seems to define new states but not actions.  Is that to be 
> left to NSS to determine?
> Ray

The way tracker updates have been done in the past is that the
the state names and the actions and behavior have been determined
by us.  The document does cover the actions where it talks about
about access groups, restrictions on some actions
and so on.  I think we probably have enough detail - we've tended
not to give any input on new user interface for new actions, just
feedback once it came in.  

But I hope that NSS will support a collaborative work style
for this update to the tracker as in previous large updates, with
a lot of interaction and feedback from a small group of early
users, including the PROTO team.

I think we should give the document to the rest of the team for
their review.  Henrik and I have been writing it.

> 
> >  
> >
> >>>We originally had a section in it on IAB and IRTF
> >>>drafts - I've suggested it be a separate document which
> >>>we should launch to those folks at the same time (Henrik?)
> >>>because the IAB and IRTF/IRSG are likely to have to hash 
> >>>their document state diagrams a bit and it would be nice
> >>>not to have to wait for them for all the work.
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>Well, OK, but it would be good to get it all done as one effort.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >My comment said launch at the same time.
> >
> >Henrik, can we start up the second IAB/IRTF draft?  The final
> >section of markup I gave on our first draft is fine for that
> >short draft, and I can do a cut in there to refine it again, especially
> >needing to fix up the IRTF part, based on Aaron's process doc.  
> >I just think we need to run that doc in parallel.
> >
> >Allison
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> --------------040005040707050004000509
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
> <html>
> <head>
>   <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
>   <title></title>
> </head>
> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
> <br>
> <br>
> Allison Mankin wrote:<br>
> <blockquote
>  cite="mid20060405141123.0148644C04C@gate8.r3.iad.emailsrvr.com"
>  type="cite">
>   <pre wrap="">Brian,
> 
>   </pre>
>   <blockquote type="cite">
>     <pre wrap="">Allison Mankin wrote:
>     </pre>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <pre wrap="">Brian,
> 
> Henrik and I have done a few iterations of this with
> Ray looking on, and as of yesterday Henrik is waiting for me 
> to look at  the last one before we send it to the PROTO team.
>       </pre>
>     </blockquote>
>     <pre wrap="">Excellent. I just don't want this to slip down the queue for
> lack of requirements.
>     </pre>
>   </blockquote>
>   <pre wrap=""><!---->
> I'll ask Ray to speak to this - Henrik and I put this on a fast track
> because Ray said this could be a high priority.  Are we still on
> track, Ray?  
>   </pre>
> </blockquote>
> Yes, we are in the process of prioritizing NSS development work and
> this is a HiPri.<br>
> BTW the doc seems to define new states but not actions.&nbsp; Is that to be
> left to NSS to determine?<br>
> Ray<br>
> <blockquote
>  cite="mid20060405141123.0148644C04C@gate8.r3.iad.emailsrvr.com"
>  type="cite">
>   <pre wrap="">
>   </pre>
>   <blockquote type="cite">
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <pre wrap="">We originally had a section in it on IAB and IRTF
> drafts - I've suggested it be a separate document which
> we should launch to those folks at the same time (Henrik?)
> because the IAB and IRTF/IRSG are likely to have to hash 
> their document state diagrams a bit and it would be nice
> not to have to wait for them for all the work.
>       </pre>
>     </blockquote>
>     <pre wrap="">Well, OK, but it would be good to get it all done as one effor
> t.
>     </pre>
>   </blockquote>
>   <pre wrap=""><!---->
> My comment said launch at the same time.
> 
> Henrik, can we start up the second IAB/IRTF draft?  The final
> section of markup I gave on our first draft is fine for that
> short draft, and I can do a cut in there to refine it again, especially
> needing to fix up the IRTF part, based on Aaron's process doc.  
> I just think we need to run that doc in parallel.
> 
> Allison
> 
>   </pre>
> </blockquote>
> </body>
> </html>
> 
> --------------040005040707050004000509--

_______________________________________________
proto-team mailing list
proto-team@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team