Re: [proto-team] editing draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de> Tue, 06 June 2006 17:14 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fnf8A-0003Rd-OB; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 13:14:14 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fnf89-0003RY-HA for proto-team@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 13:14:13 -0400
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.40]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fnf88-0002Az-2S for proto-team@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 13:14:13 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B50C2009089 for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:14:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas1.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08938-08 for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:14:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from venus.office (europa.netlab.nec.de [10.1.1.25]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C31620001B8 for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:14:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from n-eggert.office ([10.1.1.112]) by venus.office over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:14:11 +0200
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n-eggert.office (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507FE10972C for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:14:12 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
In-Reply-To: <7E0D5DF0-DE1A-4A5A-A800-94A292608B15@netlab.nec.de>
References: <7E0D5DF0-DE1A-4A5A-A800-94A292608B15@netlab.nec.de>
Message-Id: <F2DA3E5E-7578-4068-9F65-594B7B2E7688@netlab.nec.de>
Cc: proto-team@ietf.org
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>
Subject: Re: [proto-team] editing draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:14:10 +0200
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jun 2006 17:14:11.0204 (UTC) FILETIME=[A0C09440:01C6898C]
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas1.office)
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1676547e4f33b5e63227e9c02bd359e3
X-BeenThere: proto-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process and Tools Team <proto-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>, <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:proto-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>, <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0205746010=="
Errors-To: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

I've gone through most of the document, but got stuck in Section 3.3  
- the changes between -05 and -06 don't seem to make sense to me. For  
one, the text is no longer synchronized with the figures, but  
additionally, the new 3.a doesn't quite fit with the original flow of  
tasks and 3.c probably shouldn't be a step at all.

Some hints on what the intent here was may be good.

Thanks,
Lars

On Jun 2, 2006, at 12:10, Lars Eggert wrote:
> In addition to those, I've identified some other possible changes  
> that I'd like to run by you to see if they make sense:
>
> (1) One of the changes I've started to make is replacing  
> "shepherding WG chair" by "document shepherd", because secretaries  
> can be made shepherd, too. This also affects the title, which is  
> currently "Working Group Chair Document Shepherding." I'd like to  
> suggest at least "Working Group Document Shepherding" but like  
> "Document Shepherding after Working Group Last Call" even better  
> (see point 2).
>
> (2) There are currently multiple pieces of text that describe the  
> responsibilities of the shepherd in slightly different ways. As I  
> understand it, the shepherd manages a document through all stages  
> after WGLC, i.e., through AD evaluation, IETF LC, IESG evaluation  
> on to IANA and RFC Editor processing. If this is indeed the intent,  
> I'll unify those descriptions, because currently some of them don't  
> describe shepherd responsibilities during some of these stages.

-- 
Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories


_______________________________________________
proto-team mailing list
proto-team@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team