[proto-team] Fwd: Is the Ballot summary useful?
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de> Mon, 08 May 2006 20:02 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1FdBwQ-0002Li-9H; Mon, 08 May 2006 16:02:50 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FdBwP-0002KH-8Y
for proto-team@ietf.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 16:02:49 -0400
Received: from kyoto.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.21])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FdBwN-0005MP-K4
for proto-team@ietf.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 16:02:49 -0400
Received: from 86-115-13-234.wlan.dnafinland.fi (unknown [86.115.13.234])
by kyoto.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33911BAC4D
for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:56:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by 86-115-13-234.wlan.dnafinland.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0D6B0692
for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:02:42 +0300 (EEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3)
To: proto-team@ietf.org
Message-Id: <06799561-31F0-4E2E-A46D-B30048712539@netlab.nec.de>
References: <445F64CB.9060406@zurich.ibm.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 23:02:41 +0300
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d2e37451f7f22841e3b6f40c67db0f
Subject: [proto-team] Fwd: Is the Ballot summary useful?
X-BeenThere: proto-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process and Tools Team <proto-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>,
<mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:proto-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>,
<mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1028078074=="
Errors-To: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org
Begin forwarded message: > From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> > Date: May 8, 2006 6:33:31 PM GMT+03:00 > To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> > Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: Is the Ballot summary useful? > > Sam Hartman wrote: >> Before I was on the IESG I found the ballot writeups in approval >> messages incredibly useful in tracking what the IETF was doing. >> I think if we could get the ballot writeup into last call messages it >> would be very useful as well. > > That would be the *draft* writeup, but I agree. > > Hey PROTO team people, how about covering all this in the tracker > extensions to support PROTO, where we are eagerly awaiting > a proposal? > > Brian Lars -- Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories
_______________________________________________ proto-team mailing list proto-team@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team
- [proto-team] Fwd: Is the Ballot summary useful? Lars Eggert