Re: [proto-team] draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding

OK, if you post a -06 and make a publication request
I will handle it. It will have to go to Last Call as a
non-WG draft.

That's only if you *insist* on telling the community what
you're doing, of course :-)

One substantive comment: I don't see anything in there about
how the PROTO shepherd helps in summarizing and responding
to IETF Last Call comments. That seems to be a gap at a fairly
time critical moment (between LC and telechat).

     Brian

Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> 
> You seem to be missing the fact that it is our goal to be as secretive and
> mysterious as possible.  :-)
> 
> Seriously, I agree with Allison that we should get this cleaned up and
> published as an Informational RFC.
> 
> Margaret
> 
>  
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org 
>>[mailto:proto-team-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
>>Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 10:51 AM
>>To: proto-team@ietf.org
>>Subject: [proto-team] draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding
>>
>>Would you like to figure out what to do with 
>>draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding-05.txt?
>>
>>Keeping it as a mysterious Draft That Never Expires seems odd.
>>
>>I'm quite ready to post it at
>>http://www.ietf.org/u/ietfchair/opNotes.html
>>or you can post it at http://mip4.org/proto/ in both cases 
>>with the I-D boilerplate surpressed (like 
>>http://www.ietf.org/u/ietfchair/info-exp.html).
>>
>>Or if you want it as an Info RFC, I can shepherd it.
>>
>>    Brian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>proto-team mailing list
>>proto-team@ietf.org
>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team
>>
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
proto-team mailing list
proto-team@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team