Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding attached
Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com> Fri, 16 June 2006 22:17 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1FrMda-0005YX-2a; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:17:58 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FrMdX-0005Xo-H8
for proto-team@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:17:55 -0400
Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129]
helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org)
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FrL5t-00074n-TX
for proto-team@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:39:05 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62])
by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FrKZV-000085-G3
for proto-team@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:05:39 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=psg.com)
by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD))
(envelope-from <mankin@psg.com>)
id 1FrKZS-000Mg2-Kq; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 20:05:34 +0000
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>
Subject: Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding
attached
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:05:34 -0700
From: Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 926f893f9bbbfa169f045f85f0cdb955
Cc: mankin@psg.com, henrik@levkowetz.com, proto-team@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: proto-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process and Tools Team <proto-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>,
<mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:proto-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>,
<mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org
Message-Id: <E1FrMda-0005YX-2a@megatron.ietf.org>
Hi, Lars and Henrik, I have a different suggestion for you on the discussion you're having. We do use the term "writeup" for the both the larger document (former "questionnaire") and the smaller one which goes in the announcement, and I'd like not to end the latter usage, which goes back a long way, and which the Secretariat has as an ingrained convention. Here's my suggestion: OLD: The second part of the task is to prepare the Document Shepherd Write-Up that is input to both the ballot for the IESG telechat and to the eventual IETF-wide announcement message. Item number (1.i) describes the elements of this write-up. Please see other protocol announcements in the IETF Announce archive for examples of such write-ups. NEW: The second part of the task is to prepare the Draft Announcement Write-Up that is input to both the ballot for the IESG telechat and to the eventual IETF-wide announcement message. Item number (1.i) describes the elements of this announcement write-up. Some examples of Draft Announcement Write-ups are included in the Appendix, and there are many more examples with Subject lines "Protocol Action" and "Document Action" in the IETF-announce archive. [You'll note I made another change - we were asked by several people to give a few good examples rather than just point to them. I suggest for the Appendix one that Colin Perkins did for the rtp-midi-format which has some of everything: https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=1931&filename=draft-ietf-avt-rtp-midi-format And for a non-Transport example: https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=1834&filename=draft-ietf-imss-ip-over-fibre-channel On this topic, there was another comment left unaddressed. The IESG asked us if we could test the water for 1.i to say for Draft Anouncement Write-Ups for all documents, not just for Standards track and BCP. It's getting rare for an AD-sponsored document not to have one now. Was there pushback? I think we should now say it's the default. Even before this the third heading "Protocol Quality" was not always applicable, but it definitely needs to change to "Document Quality" in the event of broadening the SHOULD for 1.i. Some more fixes: Under "Document Quality", add to the questions: "If there was a MIB Doctor Review, Media type review, or other expert review, what was its course (briefly)? In the case of a media type review, on what date was the request posted?" There's a need to improve the handling of the discussion of sensitive information. Here's my suggestion. OLD: The Document Shepherd MUST send the Document Shepherd Write-Up to the Responsible Area Director and iesg-secretary@ietf.org together with the request to publish the document. The Document Shepherd SHOULD also send the write-up, minus any discussion of possible appeals, to the working group mailing list. NEW: The Document Shepherd MUST send the Document Shepherd Write-Up to the Responsible Area Director and iesg-secretary@ietf.org together with the request to publish the document. The Document Shepherd SHOULD also send the entire Document Shepherd Write-up to the working group mailing list. If there is information which may prove to be sensitive, possible appeals or personal information, which the Document Shepherd feels should be written up, it should be sent in direct email to the Responsible Area Director, because the Document Shepherd Write-up will be published openly in the tracker. I think the document title should be "Document Shepherding From WG Last Call to Approval" and the header could be "Shepherding to Approval". It does not touch shepherding anything post-approval (changes that come up, interactions with IANA and RFC Editor). Allison P.S. Looking my contributions to this text, I think I've earned a place among the authors, which doesn't push us over the limit. No affiliation still. I need to be removed from the acknowledgements if so. And I think we have commenters from ietf and wgchairs and the iesg who need to be added to the acknowledgements - Brian, Thomas Narten, Bert Wijnen, David Black, Magnus Westerlund, Carl Malamud, just say it's a partial list. I'm sure there are more, but I recall major input from all of these. P.P.S. The author list looks a little strange not being alphabetized. We could use reverse alphabetical since Dave wrote most text, But I think alphabetical would be rather ok too. > > On Jun 12, 2006, at 16:16, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > > Since the "write-up" referred to in (1.i) is *not* the Document > > Shepherd > > Write-up, I think it is more misleading to referring to it as 'the > > write-up' > > in a section concerned with the Document Shepherd Write-up. It is > > also > > not the questionnaire. If anything, we have "questionnaire" + > > "document > > summary" == "Document Shepherd Write-up". > > Oops - you're right. I think I placed that piece of text somewhere > else in my mental map of the document. > > I'll make the change but not email another version just yet - maybe > there are other comments? > > Lars > -- > Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories > > > > --Apple-Mail-29-12733882 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; > name=smime.p7s > Content-Disposition: attachment; > filename=smime.p7s > > MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIKgzCCAyAw > ggKJoAMCAQICAw9TWTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh > d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt > YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDUwODE4MTAyOTU2WhcNMDYwODE4MTAyOTU2WjBgMQ8wDQYDVQQE > EwZFZ2dlcnQxDTALBgNVBCoTBExhcnMxFDASBgNVBAMTC0xhcnMgRWdnZXJ0MSgwJgYJKoZIhvcN > AQkBFhlsYXJzLmVnZ2VydEBuZXRsYWIubmVjLmRlMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIB > CgKCAQEA2gsuG8tAmM6U2ESsQjhcijJSq6oDG2c+KvvXJ/xcJXbSIOY8IInezIP0DP41H0gxwHNv > AyOuwM6nh0r2wOhzdr77GlKXiij0LoFOpurScPKsC9KTykGAfZtAuCnWIRdDo67Urcw1e306yYgK > xF1UzYwGamLalPjejQTRcjLPIbzM4c7fUN/sxmpkpzT2p6OCJDyPhBfSaZWtv3UEoKF+xssNYzOF > DRCTHcLc3iXgF7z7J0ud8maUAadfb/25Gm7tJHzBOEonMPkHx2N8Ci0qNce0MMH/LVOVQlNO5kYJ > vUJiT0du7LAo/hf8tq3luZrh/Cwc/313x6oKYVuHDBllrQIDAQABo2IwYDAqBgUrZQEEAQQhMB8C > AQAwGjAYAgEEBBNMMnVNeWZmQk5VYk5KSmNkWjJzMCQGA1UdEQQdMBuBGWxhcnMuZWdnZXJ0QG5l > dGxhYi5uZWMuZGUwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQAovojiq8758E/78nMS > vNvD4359F8XAICzWbhz6cXJaGzv1FJoQcV/RY1x6CQZDt9PqiPiqyQX+xLvqicmEURbGU5+aiWj2 > usovQXd+Ts8Doj3tbjk35nD7Etc8a2+Y9fQRUS6spzgJr0fcq2FMYbDnOtf71Bn77KgckoUbIszu > mTCCAz8wggKooAMCAQICAQ0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgdExCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQI > EwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgGA1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1 > bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMgRGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMT > G1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJl > ZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw0wMzA3MTcwMDAwMDBaFw0xMzA3MTYyMzU5NTlaMGIxCzAJBgNV > BAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNU > aGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAw > gYkCgYEAxKY8VXNV+065yplaHmjAdQRwnd/p/6Me7L3N9VvyGna9fww6YfK/Uc4B1OVQCjDXAmNa > LIkVcI7dyfArhVqqP3FWy688Cwfn8R+RNiQqE88r1fOCdz0Dviv+uxg+B79AgAJk16emu59l0cUq > VIUPSAR/p7bRPGEEQB5kGXJgt/sCAwEAAaOBlDCBkTASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMEMGA1Ud > HwQ8MDowOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGhhd3RlLmNvbS9UaGF3dGVQZXJzb25hbEZyZWVtYWls > Q0EuY3JsMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIBBjApBgNVHREEIjAgpB4wHDEaMBgGA1UEAxMRUHJpdmF0ZUxhYmVs > Mi0xMzgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEASIzRUIPqCy7MDaNmrGcPf6+svsIXoUOWlJ1/TCG4+DYf > qi2fNi/A9BxQIJNwPP2t4WFiw9k6GX6EsZkbAMUaC4J0niVQlGLH2ydxVyWN3amcOY6MIE9lX5Xa > 9/eH1sYITq726jTlEBpbNU1341YheILcIRk13iSx0x1G/11fZU8wggQYMIIDgaADAgECAgEAMA0G > CSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIG/MQswCQYDVQQGEwJERTEcMBoGA1UECBQTQmFkZW4tV8N1ZXJ0dGVtYmVy > ZzETMBEGA1UEBxMKSGVpZGVsYmVyZzEXMBUGA1UEChMOTkVDIEV1cm9wZSBMdGQxHTAbBgNVBAsT > FE5ldHdvcmsgTGFib3JhdG9yaWVzMRswGQYDVQQDExJrb2JlLm5ldGxhYi5uZWMuZGUxKDAmBgkq > hkiG9w0BCQEWGWxhcnMuZWdnZXJ0QG5ldGxhYi5uZWMuZGUwHhcNMDQwNjE4MTE1MzA4WhcNMDkw > NjE3MTE1MzA4WjCBvzELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxHDAaBgNVBAgUE0JhZGVuLVfDdWVydHRlbWJlcmcx > EzARBgNVBAcTCkhlaWRlbGJlcmcxFzAVBgNVBAoTDk5FQyBFdXJvcGUgTHRkMR0wGwYDVQQLExRO > ZXR3b3JrIExhYm9yYXRvcmllczEbMBkGA1UEAxMSa29iZS5uZXRsYWIubmVjLmRlMSgwJgYJKoZI > hvcNAQkBFhlsYXJzLmVnZ2VydEBuZXRsYWIubmVjLmRlMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCB > iQKBgQC0OQwsE86Rrt0Zs0GOCsYmkGpPwcCFvVpOijIPv1dGolr5a8+7hXSAgRlUyoclq9xfhsUT > wlU1qkvVRD3/QOfQyPUxQktxba2ksfsPAKUHovInWydC6rvLU89jtYGEdnRCyA+cEB/XcSADbd2z > 9/XK4A2cxmMQiYpXIphYQAxIBwIDAQABo4IBIDCCARwwHQYDVR0OBBYEFOh7L9eqGHnAhbJdO4PY > LYzxCaNNMIHsBgNVHSMEgeQwgeGAFOh7L9eqGHnAhbJdO4PYLYzxCaNNoYHFpIHCMIG/MQswCQYD > VQQGEwJERTEcMBoGA1UECBQTQmFkZW4tV8N1ZXJ0dGVtYmVyZzETMBEGA1UEBxMKSGVpZGVsYmVy > ZzEXMBUGA1UEChMOTkVDIEV1cm9wZSBMdGQxHTAbBgNVBAsTFE5ldHdvcmsgTGFib3JhdG9yaWVz > MRswGQYDVQQDExJrb2JlLm5ldGxhYi5uZWMuZGUxKDAmBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWGWxhcnMuZWdnZXJ0 > QG5ldGxhYi5uZWMuZGWCAQAwDAYDVR0TBAUwAwEB/zANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOBgQCX6Ipd3AF9 > 3FDzBaw3ZVvQzzCv/kGPBBzzrJ3n5u+4eQppmOifhuWHZfb8h8S++jqcoPHGVjjlP5PaFb+wL0NR > piBalRclikD3xIY/hFoxJ1AHCO0AzfFxEflO10b4+smMrBYJtk5d9EAhr5hEgoGCM7QijBtnCwZB > KLI9pFgW1zGCA6UwggOhAgEBMGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25z > dWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1 > aW5nIENBAgMPU1kwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAhEwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkq > hkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDYwNjEyMTMyMzQ2WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQURW9xpWTE1r3Wkh4DMQBM > Q+ICmtkwgdYGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGByDCBxTCBvzELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxHDAaBgNVBAgUE0JhZGVu > LVfDdWVydHRlbWJlcmcxEzARBgNVBAcTCkhlaWRlbGJlcmcxFzAVBgNVBAoTDk5FQyBFdXJvcGUg > THRkMR0wGwYDVQQLExROZXR3b3JrIExhYm9yYXRvcmllczEbMBkGA1UEAxMSa29iZS5uZXRsYWIu > bmVjLmRlMSgwJgYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhlsYXJzLmVnZ2VydEBuZXRsYWIubmVjLmRlAgEAMIHYBgsq > hkiG9w0BCRACCzGByKCBxTCBvzELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxHDAaBgNVBAgUE0JhZGVuLVfDdWVydHRl > bWJlcmcxEzARBgNVBAcTCkhlaWRlbGJlcmcxFzAVBgNVBAoTDk5FQyBFdXJvcGUgTHRkMR0wGwYD > VQQLExROZXR3b3JrIExhYm9yYXRvcmllczEbMBkGA1UEAxMSa29iZS5uZXRsYWIubmVjLmRlMSgw > JgYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhlsYXJzLmVnZ2VydEBuZXRsYWIubmVjLmRlAgEAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUA > BIIBAGH/Qt1svPFlNrM/yndoEcnMZGHex5FYTzODuJGWnZ8Sj37zTsFrN/L1zgqJxqb5qQCcLVfF > L7hp544lEn6jTOcB8vYprI0Ng+o57NDpqg+GgwZFXeDyhupuHvD6PRcDwS4iiHxwPx9ULpcjCD7G > cWSAxxDHdIQkZRXpN5lJ0OuXRJc83FsQDcC6Y9A5muNoymqrbMeqfSad+yh1zgs+ej09zE2Y4JLy > XMV9CoA3XpkCHH0QFpCsnleYXXRNpXxfFN85/JJCc9AH0gMOnaSlzLd0rdmcZtBPVaYgbvh0Z0gB > 3m4p5be9OObxjJnorAMogyG56wSA2bi3haGQv9jsMfkAAAAAAAA= > > --Apple-Mail-29-12733882-- > > > --===============0679166344== > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Disposition: inline > > _______________________________________________ > proto-team mailing list > proto-team@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team > > --===============0679166344==-- > _______________________________________________ proto-team mailing list proto-team@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team
- [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgchair… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… David Meyer
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Allison Mankin
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Allison Mankin
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Allison Mankin
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert
- Re: [proto-team] revision of draft-ietf-proto-wgc… Lars Eggert