[proto-team] Re: [IRSG] Adding IETF tracker support for IAB and IRTF document shepherds

John,

We slipped.  It also needs a next state of In RG Last Call,
at least.

Thanks for noticing this.

What other states would RGs find useful?  This is very
bare bones, to provide very simple tracking and transparency
for the drafts.

For instance, would you like to have 

 RG Document Awaiting Reviews

I'd propose some text like:

     This document needs reviews (possibly a certain number of reviews,
      at a minimum) before the publication process can proceed

      Possible next states: "Active WG Document", "Parked WG Document",
      "In RG Last Call", "In IRSG Evaluation", "Dead"

      Permitted sub-states: "0 reviews", "1 reviews", "2 reviews", "3
      reviews", "4 reviews", "5 reviews", "Awaiting MIB Doctor Review",
      *** More special review states ***
      (R-xxx)

 Some questions on this:  would this be used for internal RG required
 reviews if you have them, as well as the required IRSG reviews?  Is it 
 reasonal to overload it if that happens?  Would it be reasonable to
 leave the extra numbers there because of the potential for change?
 The tracker is very simplistic and we don't want to keep remodeling
 it.  If you have the potential to use it for internal required 
 reviews, do you want to have distinct states?

_______________________________________________
proto-team mailing list
proto-team@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team