[proto-team] Fwd: ID Nits

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de> Fri, 27 October 2006 03:21 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdIHP-000151-Oo; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:21:11 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdIHN-00011T-6Y for proto-team@ietf.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:21:09 -0400
Received: from kyoto.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.21]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdIHL-0005zR-J9 for proto-team@ietf.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:21:09 -0400
Received: from lars.local (p54AD1953.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.25.83]) by kyoto.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1161BAC4D for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 05:21:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lars.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9AB25D86F for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 05:21:03 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
To: proto-team@ietf.org
Message-Id: <E04CB46A-2B89-492C-81DD-E9608B36771C@netlab.nec.de>
References: <20061026175709.GB17447@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 05:21:01 +0200
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1676547e4f33b5e63227e9c02bd359e3
Subject: [proto-team] Fwd: ID Nits
X-BeenThere: proto-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process and Tools Team <proto-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>, <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:proto-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>, <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1458553571=="
Errors-To: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org

Something we may consider changing in the draft.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: David Kessens <david.kessens@nokia.com>
> Date: October 26, 2006 7:57:09 PM GMT+02:00
> To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
> Cc: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: ID Nits
>
>
> Dan,
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:05:45AM -0700, Dan Wing wrote:
>>
>>>> I guess this means we should all stress in our respective WGs that
>>>> authors should always check their drafts with that tool before
>>>> submitting a supposedly final revision.
>>>
>>> And the PROTO shepherd needs to also personally check this. The
>>> writeup specifically asks:
>>
>> Instead of "have you run it", how about asking:
>>
>>   The PROTO shepherd should indicate which version of idnits
>>   was run against the document.
>
> I like this idea.
>
> David Kessens
> ---
>

Lars
-- 
Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories


_______________________________________________
proto-team mailing list
proto-team@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team