Re: [proto-team] Re: PROTO - proceeding on adding PROTO shepherds to the tracker

Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> Tue, 16 May 2006 18:48 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fg4af-0006AR-3u; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:48:17 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fg4ad-0006A2-Ed; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:48:15 -0400
Received: from mail-red.research.att.com ([192.20.225.110]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fg4ad-0006Ke-9Q; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:48:15 -0400
Received: from bright.research.att.com (bright.research.att.com [135.207.20.189]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E578147; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:48:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by bright.research.att.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/Submit) id k4GImF4i005235; Tue, 16 May 2006 11:48:15 -0700
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Message-Id: <200605161848.k4GImF4i005235@bright.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: henrik@levkowetz.com
Subject: Re: [proto-team] Re: PROTO - proceeding on adding PROTO shepherds to the tracker
References: <E1FdpF4-0007xU-Fk@megatron.ietf.org> <446715D7.7080701@zurich.ibm.com> <446726DE.8040904@levkowetz.com> <44673AB3.2050002@zurich.ibm.com> <4467436E.2060400@levkowetz.com> <A9A5C496-4C40-43F8-86C7-8EC882AF85D9@osafoundation.org> <4468F2AA.60707@levkowetz.com> <446980AD.7030200@zurich.ibm.com> <44699905.1090405@levkowetz.com> <93BF5579-D718-4C3E-A3E1-A44F04C87769@osafoundation.org> <446A0AD0.9020007@levkowetz.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:48:14 -0700
Versions: dmail (linux) 2.7/makemail 2.14
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, proto-team@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: proto-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process and Tools Team <proto-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>, <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:proto-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>, <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org

Here's a question:

Will the WG want to use the "in WG" states when the
IESG has said "Revise this document to address these
concerns" (e.g., AD Evaluation/Revised ID Needed, or
IESG Evaluation/Revised ID Needed)?

I think the answer could be "Yes", meaning that this is
actually a parallel state machine, not an extension to
the existing state machine.

  Bill

_______________________________________________
proto-team mailing list
proto-team@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team