IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [provreg] EPP Domain Contacts

Corey Goldfeder <cgoldfeder@google.com> Wed, 04 December 2013 05:26 UTC

Return-Path: <cgoldfeder@google.com>
X-Original-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DED1ADFD3 for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:26:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jFtMbxGlrGqP for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:26:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-x22f.google.com (mail-bk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0E11ADF88 for <provreg@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:26:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id mx12so6361804bkb.20 for <provreg@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=3Zq0Ldka552nXR8Djdmoz04pJya9hC9uE8vLNCgCi5o=; b=dAP7ZR8yoNsfCLjRJqt0s1UPiyP+27Ba8GNxPneNVP8QUkgeR6EZ5wkx4cxco3quG+ Q2+1sp7c6VTacF5dSVZocdn5rA2biDDoaILri2LIh3ChfhCiIgeWtTSOK01ULetRlq28 jmeqvsx1xOcc0bGLPQRt2DKHS5h2lpKbrH61EyZaDmQ/5+mqom6Mnr2vlwAhSxM4hxdl VmdDo87EmkBjAJqk1F53cDvvZpnqIuILVxR9FmtHhowohDxzdeCvlpkMLOAk8fEoI/UP opu48o74obl8sSnodFh854xQrKERUx8ylATHBhNuDeQ5DwXfuead+Zen7/fsljulCGoz 3/lA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=3Zq0Ldka552nXR8Djdmoz04pJya9hC9uE8vLNCgCi5o=; b=N78PVsPjeqSNRxjlau0qIEPfjLLxh2rimh2JbRXyJNkZtQpjHTXwEVXou0sb4Aem4h PNiptjodwzoWjUJKRrYMSOL5SXJruwy1SIbKg1Xw+nDC23U7BpS/qyQ5u3swuXv+74Tf Y8O5NvrbtIEeSHfgPVOR2WvWPLHymBQ+ZXOw9/d8e5hePIQzTFh8CX5ZKdmVYN3Jo3LF 364+lh+mGr9sxKVqkY7ajHMVCzZNDUvSZq+SzFwgheGDx8DT22nGWxkKDIF9IAvqK1gG CvVYtLos7y/p7+so8KBnaNPB1Ux4LlZDvdYXDY4f91hsUXV4ucLQCxi7Mr3GE5jpBsxP WFzQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkCtf0iM8UtJibR8xIfvGwNv1JOtyd1/b6vmWOJHsHNM4o+k/2hZSlUzyy69okuXS72XnfJTpwwuiU/2iEJFFYdVcP+R5+lR2rHDsF7XH6K0c2hRQVTzJHyXobj7jeWGGZ3XZy+OJTmGkDwjnOqClhDALIpp1SJp3oI3kl6sKFmo5/W2FceW+Bh9U0lbGC1/xrR1tpS
X-Received: by 10.204.227.14 with SMTP id iy14mr18707bkb.161.1386134792720; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.205.11.6 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:26:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <07F9FB60-1BAE-4AB9-A6DC-5BA2F3283096@gmail.com>
References: <07F9FB60-1BAE-4AB9-A6DC-5BA2F3283096@gmail.com>
From: Corey Goldfeder <cgoldfeder@google.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:26:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKbEXbKOC432jajaQxepfzf0bTnKMgm_8SsXj51N9pT3LT4B7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mike O'Connell" <mcanix@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b3970d1eeeede3b04ecaea76f
Cc: "provreg@ietf.org" <provreg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [provreg] EPP Domain Contacts
X-BeenThere: provreg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPP discussion list <provreg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/provreg/>
List-Post: <mailto:provreg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 05:26:38 -0000

We at Charleston Road Registry return a 2306 for contacts without type. (In
other words, we enforce type as a required attribute by policy rather than
by schema).


On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Mike O'Connell <mcanix@gmail.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> I came across an issue the other day around Domain Contacts, specifically,
> the domain contact element contains an optional attribute 'type' which can
> be one of [tech, billing, admin]. The problem here is that the attribute is
> optional with no assumed default.
>
>
>    1. Does anybody use the domain contact element without the 'type'
>    attribute?
>    2. Does anybody use a default value for the 'type' attribute when it
>    is not provided?
>
>
> Apologies if this is a old/duplicate topic.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
>
> --
>
> If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> provreg mailing list
> provreg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email