[provreg] FW: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731 (4200)
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Tue, 16 December 2014 14:15 UTC
Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFE71A1AEB for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:15:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GIo1ydFLI-HY for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:15:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod6og104.obsmtp.com (exprod6og104.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.187]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B8A01A1AB3 for <provreg@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:15:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com ([72.13.63.41]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob104.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKVJA+ezh0ok9A9oI5xb70ytzZPob/Yytq@postini.com; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:15:23 PST
Received: from BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexchm01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.255]) by brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sBGEFMrO024831 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <provreg@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:15:22 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:15:21 -0500
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "provreg@ietf.org" <provreg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731 (4200)
Thread-Index: AQHQGH+BntNiRgmcHEmXfH7H09UTWJySRDhg
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:15:21 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4954493E@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <20141215155453.BE6A118123F@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141215155453.BE6A118123F@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/provreg/JN9ONKBVTutA0BoIMKcjtt13Z14
Subject: [provreg] FW: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731 (4200)
X-BeenThere: provreg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPP discussion list <provreg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/provreg/>
List-Post: <mailto:provreg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:15:26 -0000
FYI, folks. I'll forward the response I sent in a moment. Scott -----Original Message----- From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 10:55 AM To: Hollenbeck, Scott; iesg@ietf.org Cc: bortzmeyer+rfceditor@nic.fr; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731 (4200) The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5731, "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5731&eid=4200 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Stéphane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+rfceditor@nic.fr> Section: 3.2.3 Original Text ------------- C: <domain:curExpDate>2000-04-03</domain:curExpDate> Corrected Text -------------- C: <domain:curExpDate>2000-04-03Z</domain:curExpDate> Notes ----- The Z for UTC seems mandatory, per section 2.4 (in XML schema, it is optional http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#date ). Since <renew> is the only command with date (and not date-times), one may think dates are not forced to have a trailing Z but it is not mentioned in the RFC. Detected by Kim-Minh Kaplan at AFNIC. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5731 (draft-hollenbeck-rfc4931bis-01) -------------------------------------- Title : Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping Publication Date : August 2009 Author(s) : S. Hollenbeck Category : INTERNET STANDARD Source : IETF - NON WORKING GROUP Area : N/A Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [provreg] FW: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5731… Hollenbeck, Scott
- [provreg] FW: RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC… Hollenbeck, Scott
- [provreg] FW: [Errata Rejected] RFC5731 (4200) Hollenbeck, Scott