Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
MICHAEL W YOUNG <michael@mwyoung.ca> Mon, 04 November 2013 22:33 UTC
Return-Path: <michael@mwyoung.ca>
X-Original-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 0A09811E816D for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:33:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id arkqfOoLc06h for
<provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:33:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com
[209.85.223.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27FB11E8185 for
<provreg@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:33:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id as1so13740561iec.27 for
<provreg@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:33:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net;
s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to;
bh=Z8oQiGTEKrwlteCSIZdoqTojrtiuIpaV6KesD242p4k=;
b=DJNNYTMZmGPHPSkLTlclPnr+yM7BzkROUmvm0am+lEMOvf0kvljjssSzc4sn4RM3Tg
brDVoq3fa7B8PhfGoMGhUHoQVClRUJ4PY8gKkNsNymcnVX4k6dC19McwPNE+XHmVUVJ2
T7mHLcLCRyL9ubduvhqpgq7q4rBhDITUapMyuFY42+LadH8HxLVHxsUPbSR6pc3mwMiI
MnINbfrHJGujtreyz9YkGmaDgMk6h8vSlEfQTQm8scoeyT2c6XHcK9I+vEs9ZY2bnmiV
Ft/20SBB4d1rEhjiy316o3yIQfqz6p5bNMAL7lCgtP7iNI4agZbcBn7W6YfTmwsfnqA4 fM4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl3NRIwth+DujB2pGRjk5Tx3JuLs6CDQgbrc3cNoSRO/Kjvz68f8LxQE6My4esNVvaJyvQB
X-Received: by 10.50.11.11 with SMTP id m11mr13597097igb.47.1383604403240;
Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:33:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.1.44]
(CPE74d02b4255c8-CM78cd8ece2635.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com. [173.32.3.13]) by
mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i11sm4779589igh.0.2013.11.04.14.33.21 for
<multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:33:22 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_3D9F9EFF-3B1C-48FD-BCB6-7C4B82FF8F71"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: MICHAEL W YOUNG <michael@mwyoung.ca>
In-Reply-To: <1383603400.7757.12.camel@citrine-mobile>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 17:33:20 -0500
Message-Id: <50BA5417-0506-4976-A61E-8C7D26186D01@mwyoung.ca>
References: <CE99706E.51081%jgould@verisign.com>
<52779E1E.7070209@centralnic.com>
<B90E03E1-76A2-4806-91F2-608C206B64E6@mwyoung.ca>
<1383603400.7757.12.camel@citrine-mobile>
To: Patrick Mevzek <Patrick.Mevzek@afnic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: provreg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning
Protocol
X-BeenThere: provreg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPP discussion list <provreg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/provreg>,
<mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/provreg>
List-Post: <mailto:provreg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg>,
<mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 22:33:33 -0000
> > So domain:info prior to a creation seem counter-nature to me > Interesting point, however, Same principle applies with <check> , if the domain doesn't exist in the registry and you send back pricing information it's a query for information about a non-existent domain object. Both <check> and <info> are referring to a domain object if it exists and returning information (pricing) regardless if the domain object doesn't exist. So, really, if anything, that supports the argument for new commands,........and new objects (a pricing object) - now watch everyone groan on the list. -M > -- > Patrick Mevzek > > > _______________________________________________ > provreg mailing list > provreg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg MICHAEL W YOUNG michael@mwyoung.ca
- [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Extensib… Gavin Brown
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Michele Neylon - Blacknight
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Rubens Kuhl
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Gavin Brown
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Michele Neylon - Blacknight
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Gould, James
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Klaus Malorny
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Luis Muñoz
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Gavin Brown
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Gavin Brown
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… MICHAEL W YOUNG
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Gavin Brown
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Luis Muñoz
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Gavin Brown
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Gould, James
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Gavin Brown
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… MICHAEL W YOUNG
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Luis Muñoz
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Jan Saell
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Gavin Brown
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Patrick Mevzek
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Seth Goldman
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… MICHAEL W YOUNG
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Patrick Mevzek
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Gavin Brown
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Maarten Bosteels
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Keith Gaughan
- Re: [provreg] Registry Fee Extension for the Exte… Gould, James