IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [provreg] EPP Domain Contacts

Mike O'Connell <mcanix@gmail.com> Wed, 04 December 2013 06:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mcanix@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6EA1ADEBB for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 22:36:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QI202nnr32JG for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 22:36:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835481AE04D for <provreg@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 22:36:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cc10so7655715wib.16 for <provreg@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:36:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=JD0kruub6MJ6mrsW8E8Er8Fyl1+A+2ID60Uyx8LUnXg=; b=YakWLMkrZ4QGHLGkzAGeqpS0oH+iUWJqCQcC+SkYAKsB1ni1Yfx2VQWM7s+vr+cwaS SAVv+Wg0vWiuv6ab8EETCnUrcIjF5mQEQGNyNvBTBRgv2IVnsAr6byS06XdVUvxaBqe0 +SjDZEsXPQyBlDoDpHVC9ldfoq1CSXohY1Uc9fSoMm3S/K1+EX73KkCNQuNde8PIG+We Ks5QVhlZecrg5iO3GwAB0Mzy7Tsn4XSRAV87JcngxWGvHMyq+3NYTzLNHDEfaeN/Z0Lo I7fIjLgQTOlbx/iMqj6NMzNy8dM9K/RxMRWLvOWxOfDGrHnL9E7CP5iVeSPh5z9cmXLI vxzA==
X-Received: by 10.195.13.45 with SMTP id ev13mr61253882wjd.20.1386138963077; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:36:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nakal.int.coza.net.za ([206.223.136.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w1sm3911479wib.6.2013.12.03.22.36.01 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:36:02 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2F9B51B0-CA39-4B2F-ACFB-197A19B74461"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Mike O'Connell <mcanix@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKbEXbKOC432jajaQxepfzf0bTnKMgm_8SsXj51N9pT3LT4B7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 08:35:57 +0200
Message-Id: <10A78711-E15A-4246-ADDE-F812EB12DA72@gmail.com>
References: <07F9FB60-1BAE-4AB9-A6DC-5BA2F3283096@gmail.com> <CAKbEXbKOC432jajaQxepfzf0bTnKMgm_8SsXj51N9pT3LT4B7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Corey Goldfeder <cgoldfeder@google.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "provreg@ietf.org" <provreg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [provreg] EPP Domain Contacts
X-BeenThere: provreg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPP discussion list <provreg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/provreg/>
List-Post: <mailto:provreg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 06:36:08 -0000

On 04 Dec 2013, at 7:26 AM, Corey Goldfeder <cgoldfeder@google.com> wrote:

> We at Charleston Road Registry return a 2306 for contacts without type. (In other words, we enforce type as a required attribute by policy rather than by schema).

Agreed - I've put a policy check in place to prevent it. I just wonder if the spec should be slightly clearer about the type usage. 


> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Mike O'Connell <mcanix@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
> 
> I came across an issue the other day around Domain Contacts, specifically, the domain contact element contains an optional attribute 'type' which can be one of [tech, billing, admin]. The problem here is that the attribute is optional with no assumed default. 
> 
> Does anybody use the domain contact element without the 'type' attribute? 
> Does anybody use a default value for the 'type' attribute when it is not provided?
> 
> Apologies if this is a old/duplicate topic.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mike
> 
> --
> 
> If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> provreg mailing list
> provreg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
> 
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email