Re: [provreg] New Version Notification for draft-brown-epp-fees-01.txt

Jens Wagner <jwagner@hexonet.net> Thu, 08 May 2014 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jwagner@hexonet.net>
X-Original-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FA01A0162 for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 May 2014 14:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z6dtZuYvyL7p for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 May 2014 14:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from internal-mail-out1.ispapi.net (internal-mail-out1.ispapi.net [93.190.234.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30E21A0160 for <provreg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 May 2014 14:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from internal-mail-relay2.sls.de.hexonet.net (unknown [10.190.234.72]) by internal-mail-out1.ispapi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8F810401A0; Thu, 8 May 2014 21:43:29 +0000 (UTC)
Envelope-to: gavin.brown@centralnic.com, provreg@ietf.org
Received: from p5dd446be.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.212.70.190]:39825 helo=[192.168.2.120]) by internal-mail-relay2.sls.de.hexonet.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jwagner@hexonet.net>) id 1WiW6D-000484-Bp; Thu, 08 May 2014 21:43:29 +0000
Message-ID: <536BFA7F.8040300@hexonet.net>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 23:43:27 +0200
From: Jens Wagner <jwagner@hexonet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gavin Brown <gavin.brown@centralnic.com>, "provreg@ietf.org" <provreg@ietf.org>
References: <CF7FD1F2.5DB6E%jgould@verisign.com> <53628077.8070402@centralnic.com> <CADJsPYwLj3uPCU=VenL2rVYkf7ZeD7=TXHjevL2WRgC44Vwx_g@mail.gmail.com> <A939B4D2-FF12-428D-A943-0A0A1DE94B9F@isc.org> <CAAHh_-+05Opw9vhiAAE=FPrQCaAFQ0aNGcxpNn-5Xn-fGgj5pg@mail.gmail.com> <CADJsPYzmxGm5NKnj35KLbHybih-3SQKJ3psi035okpqmvu2Epw@mail.gmail.com> <F0AA8F24-323D-4F32-A271-6FC2A0FDE746@nic.br> <536BA06C.4070004@hexonet.net> <CADJsPYyYiR3FZH-HNcw=4sgw9E0uCfR_orD4TAVPfDvPQSVySQ@mail.gmail.com> <536BC518.4050400@centralnic.com> <CADJsPYxSsm=TYf2J-ZyMAXL0o71zMiDCWzXAMDL6Ggtf3d0mfg@mail.gmail.com> <536BF4FB.9070709@hexonet.net> <536BF84C.6030302@centralnic.com>
In-Reply-To: <536BF84C.6030302@centralnic.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 93.212.70.190
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jwagner@hexonet.net
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/provreg/Xx6R1D-0HONyExEck5ackq7JI1s
Subject: Re: [provreg] New Version Notification for draft-brown-epp-fees-01.txt
X-BeenThere: provreg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPP discussion list <provreg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/provreg/>
List-Post: <mailto:provreg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 21:43:36 -0000

Yes, <fee:type> or <fee:class>, I don't have any favorites.

Thank you,
- jens

Am 08.05.2014 23:34, schrieb Gavin Brown:
> On 08/05/2014 22:19, Jens Wagner wrote:
>> +1
>> That would work, but according to the draft, EPP clients provide the
>> <fee:name> element on <check> requests only.
>> Would also need the attribute for <domain:create>, renew, transfer and
>> so on.
>> Maybe we could use an element e.g. <class>, instead of an attribute? Or
>> also assign the attribute to the <fee:create>, <fee:renew> ... elements?
> Yes, I realised that shortly after I sent the email. It needs to be an
> element rather than an attribute.
>
> <fee:type> perhaps?
>
> G.
>