[provreg] FW: [Errata Rejected] RFC5731 (4200)

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Thu, 18 December 2014 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944C11A6FA8 for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 03:59:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cUTBQzRUhyk4 for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 03:59:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod6og105.obsmtp.com (exprod6og105.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 303D41A1BBB for <provreg@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 03:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brn1lxmailout02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([72.13.63.42]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob105.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKVJLBtDdHSjftV71+zHzMkzpnHRgCgUDJ@postini.com; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 03:59:49 PST
Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.206]) by brn1lxmailout02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sBIBxl7B018313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <provreg@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:59:47 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:59:47 -0500
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "provreg@ietf.org" <provreg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Errata Rejected] RFC5731 (4200)
Thread-Index: AQHQGkofLTz5NUJJQ0eYhIQRY6CDN5yVP5vw
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:59:46 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F49F034BC@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <20141217223742.066EA181243@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141217223742.066EA181243@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/provreg/hqhDzDvaEY7ubdklfarH4NOIbfA
Subject: [provreg] FW: [Errata Rejected] RFC5731 (4200)
X-BeenThere: provreg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPP discussion list <provreg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/provreg/>
List-Post: <mailto:provreg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:59:51 -0000

FYI

Scott


-----Original Message-----
From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 5:38 PM
To: bortzmeyer+rfceditor@nic.fr; Hollenbeck, Scott
Cc: barryleiba@computer.org; iesg@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Errata Rejected] RFC5731 (4200)

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC5731,
"Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5731&eid=4200

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported by: Stéphane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+rfceditor@nic.fr>
Date Reported: 2014-12-15
Rejected by: Barry Leiba (IESG)

Section: 3.2.3

Original Text
-------------
 C:        <domain:curExpDate>2000-04-03</domain:curExpDate>

Corrected Text
--------------
 C:        <domain:curExpDate>2000-04-03Z</domain:curExpDate>

Notes
-----
The Z for UTC seems mandatory, per section 2.4 (in XML schema, it is optional http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#date ). Since <renew> is the only command with date (and not date-times), one may think dates are not forced to have a trailing Z but it is not mentioned in the RFC.

Detected by Kim-Minh Kaplan at AFNIC.
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
The RFC could be clearer, but it is consistent that the "Z" is required in date-time but not on date only.

--------------------------------------
RFC5731 (draft-hollenbeck-rfc4931bis-01)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping
Publication Date    : August 2009
Author(s)           : S. Hollenbeck
Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
Source              : IETF - NON WORKING GROUP
Area                : N/A
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG