"status" element in <domain:info> response
"Liu, Hong" <Hong.Liu@neustar.biz> Wed, 11 September 2002 13:22 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se (nic.cafax.se [192.71.228.17])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA08569
for <provreg-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:22:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nic.cafax.se (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8BDK6o2022399
for <ietf-provreg-outgoing@nic.cafax.se>;
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:20:06 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g8BDK5s0022398
for ietf-provreg-outgoing; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:20:05 +0200 (MEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: nic.cafax.se: majordom set sender to
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se using -f
Received: from oak.neustar.com (oak.neustar.com [209.173.53.70])
by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8BDK4o2022393
for <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:20:04 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from stntimc1.va.neustar.com (stntimc1.va.neustar.com [10.31.13.11])
by oak.neustar.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g8BDK2G32290
for <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:20:02 GMT
Received: by STNTIMC1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <RZ7WBB3X>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:21:10 -0400
Message-ID: <5E42C1C85C5D064A947CF92FADE6D82E3EC2EB@STNTEXCH1>
From: "Liu, Hong" <Hong.Liu@neustar.biz>
To: "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Subject: "status" element in <domain:info> response
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:19:59 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
Scott, I have another question for clarification regarding the "status" element in <domain:info> response for Domain -05. (Actually, similar text appears in Domain -04). On page 12, in describing <domain:status>, it says "One or more OPTIONAL". But in the domain-1.0.xsd schema on page 38, the cardinality of <status> in "infDataType" is minOccurs="0" and maxOccurs="12". There are two issues involved: (1) Should the description on page 12 be changed from "One" to "Zero"? (2) Should a cap be put on the number of statii returned? If so, is the cap value "12" or "17"? When I check the "statusValueType" on page 39, there are 17 values defined in the schema. Could you please make them consistent? Thanks! --Hong
- "status" element in <domain:info> response Liu, Hong
- RE: "status" element in <domain:info> response Hollenbeck, Scott
- RE: "status" element in <domain:info> response Liu, Hong
- RE: "status" element in <domain:info> response Hollenbeck, Scott
- RE: "status" element in <domain:info> response Liu, Hong