IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [provreg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-brown-epp-fees-01.txt

Gavin Brown <gavin.brown@centralnic.com> Thu, 08 May 2014 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <gavin.brown@centralnic.com>
X-Original-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575361A00D8 for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 May 2014 10:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.037
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.037 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ozDl7eKe8fUt for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 May 2014 10:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.centralnic.com (mail-7.fnb.uk.centralnic.net [5.44.25.120]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F311A00CB for <provreg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 May 2014 10:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.43.58] (unknown [31.68.128.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.centralnic.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 052F19EBA; Thu, 8 May 2014 17:35:34 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <536BC065.7060900@centralnic.com>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 18:35:33 +0100
From: Gavin Brown <gavin.brown@centralnic.com>
Organization: CentralNic Ltd
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Seth Goldman <sethamin@google.com>, Jens Wagner <jwagner@hexonet.net>
References: <CF7FD1F2.5DB6E%jgould@verisign.com> <53628077.8070402@centralnic.com> <536BA5D2.9010205@hexonet.net> <CAAHh_-J+o3ssgTRm=9XVrNuGWC-BYjOny3fVdSazLwESz-iGQw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAHh_-J+o3ssgTRm=9XVrNuGWC-BYjOny3fVdSazLwESz-iGQw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
OpenPGP: id=F923B4CE
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="q2d5Cheqi327GPg4lB5i05eOu1olLrL4A"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/provreg/mUaI7N9kPEbmlrQNprSuTYxJRP4
Cc: EPP Provreg <provreg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [provreg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-brown-epp-fees-01.txt
X-BeenThere: provreg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPP discussion list <provreg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/provreg/>
List-Post: <mailto:provreg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 17:35:42 -0000

On 08/05/2014 16:54, Seth Goldman wrote:
> In general, I'd advocate for making the protocol as flexible as possible
> for expressing the data (within reason), while leaving the exact
> semantics of that data as "server policy". Otherwise you end up
> embedding a lot of business logic into the protocol, which then forces
> registries and resellers to modify or add extensions when their use case
> doesn't exactly match the canonical use case of the spec.

+1 - that's my objective. This extension needs to be fairly flexible
because I don't want the next registry to come along with a novel
business model to reinvent the wheel.

G.

-- 
Gavin Brown
Chief Technology Officer
CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC)
Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services
for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries
https://www.centralnic.com/

CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with
company number 8576358. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London,
EC2R 6AR.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email