RE: "status" element in <domain:info> response
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Wed, 11 September 2002 13:51 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se (nic.cafax.se [192.71.228.17])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA09556
for <provreg-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:51:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nic.cafax.se (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8BDmTo2022788
for <ietf-provreg-outgoing@nic.cafax.se>;
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:48:29 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g8BDmTdV022787
for ietf-provreg-outgoing; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:48:29 +0200 (MEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: nic.cafax.se: majordom set sender to
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se using -f
Received: from heron.verisign.com (heron.verisign.com [216.168.233.95])
by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8BDmSo2022781
for <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:48:28 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from VSVAPOSTALGW1.prod.netsol.com (vsvapostalgw1.prod.netsol.com
[216.168.234.201])
by heron.verisign.com (nsi_0.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA12864;
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:49:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by VSVAPOSTALGW1.prod.netsol.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <RV4GS7W2>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:48:17 -0400
Message-ID: <3CD14E451751BD42BA48AAA50B07BAD60336FECA@vsvapostal3.prod.netsol.com>
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "'Liu, Hong'" <Hong.Liu@neustar.biz>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'"
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Subject: RE: "status" element in <domain:info> response
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:48:15 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
> I have another question for clarification regarding the > "status" element in > <domain:info> response for Domain -05. (Actually, similar > text appears in > Domain -04). > > On page 12, in describing <domain:status>, it says "One or > more OPTIONAL". > But in the domain-1.0.xsd schema on page 38, the cardinality > of <status> in > "infDataType" is minOccurs="0" and maxOccurs="12". > > There are two issues involved: > (1) Should the description on page 12 be changed from "One" to "Zero"? No, because there always has to be at least one status value. It should be changed to remove the word "OPTIONAL". The schema should be changed to remove minOccurs="0". > (2) Should a cap be put on the number of statii returned? If > so, is the cap > value "12" or "17"? When I check the "statusValueType" on > page 39, there are > 17 values defined in the schema. Re-read section 2.3. There may be 17 values defined, but they can't all be present at the same time. -Scott-
- "status" element in <domain:info> response Liu, Hong
- RE: "status" element in <domain:info> response Hollenbeck, Scott
- RE: "status" element in <domain:info> response Liu, Hong
- RE: "status" element in <domain:info> response Hollenbeck, Scott
- RE: "status" element in <domain:info> response Liu, Hong