Re: [PSAMP] PSAMP info: selectionSequenceId
Juergen Quittek <Quittek@nw.neclab.eu> Wed, 29 October 2008 10:20 UTC
Return-Path: <psamp-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: psamp-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-psamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE56B3A6932; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: psamp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: psamp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FAF03A683F for <psamp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HruQzZ-LVZa6 for <psamp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu (smtp0.neclab.eu [195.37.70.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCB73A685A for <psamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5802C01C8EC; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:20:46 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas2.office)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas2.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XvC7NGfkRq9L; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:20:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from VENUS.office (mx2.office [192.168.24.15]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B21B2C000359; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:20:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 10.1.2.178 ([10.1.2.178]) by VENUS.office ([192.168.24.102]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:20:35 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.13.0.080930
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:20:36 +0100
From: Juergen Quittek <Quittek@nw.neclab.eu>
To: Gerhard Muenz <muenz@net.in.tum.de>, IETF PSAMP Working Group <psamp@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C52DF784.6021E%Quittek@nw.neclab.eu>
Thread-Topic: [PSAMP] PSAMP info: selectionSequenceId
Thread-Index: Ack5r/uZCh/ywzTT2UaJc1WubKDxpw==
In-Reply-To: <49072120.7000907@net.in.tum.de>
Mime-version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PSAMP] PSAMP info: selectionSequenceId
X-BeenThere: psamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This mailing list is used for discussion within the IETF packet sampling \(PSAMP\) WG" <psamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/psamp>, <mailto:psamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/psamp>
List-Post: <mailto:psamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:psamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/psamp>, <mailto:psamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: psamp-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: psamp-bounces@ietf.org
Dear authors of PSAMP-INFO and PSAMP-SELECT,
Please check if you have an answer on this question.
Thanks,
Juergen
On 28.10.08 15:26 "Gerhard Muenz" <muenz@net.in.tum.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason for having
> - selectionSequenceId of type unsigned64 and
> - selectorId of type unsigned16?
>
> I would assume that it does not make sense to allow many many more
> Selection Sequences than Selectors.
>
> Regards,
> Gerhard
_______________________________________________
PSAMP mailing list
PSAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/psamp
- [PSAMP] PSAMP info: selectionSequenceId Gerhard Muenz
- Re: [PSAMP] PSAMP info: selectionSequenceId Juergen Quittek
- Re: [PSAMP] PSAMP info: selectionSequenceId Benoit Claise