Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP data plane:are they compatible?
Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> Sun, 19 June 2011 04:04 UTC
Return-Path: <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F22211E80BD; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.736
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.736 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_53=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L-5grqlbhmcK; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ilptbmg01.ecitele.com (ilptbmg01-out.ecitele.com [147.234.242.234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB8E11E80B6; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 93eaf2e7-b7c82ae0000020ff-c6-4dfd7557b9bc
Received: from ILPTEXCH02.ecitele.com ( [147.234.245.181]) by ilptbmg01.ecitele.com (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id A1.D0.08447.7557DFD4; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 07:04:39 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com ([147.234.244.212]) by ILPTEXCH02.ecitele.com ([147.234.245.181]) with mapi; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 07:04:46 +0300
From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
To: "davarish@yahoo.com" <davarish@yahoo.com>, "mpls-bounces@ietf.org" <mpls-bounces@ietf.org>, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 07:04:45 +0300
Thread-Topic: [mpls] [PWE3] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP data plane:are they compatible?
Thread-Index: Acwt+GKfP7ICXhYOQty4JE+eqpbXyAAPF4qM
Message-ID: <A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C76E9BD80C980@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>
References: <A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C76E9BD80C97E@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>, <BANLkTim=0LAmsft=JnqFQYODfa17nfirDg@mail.gmail.com><A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C76E9BD80C97F@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>, <1398490709-1308429804-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-749160581-@b4.c27.bise6.blackberry>
In-Reply-To: <1398490709-1308429804-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-749160581-@b4.c27.bise6.blackberry>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA2VTW0wTWRjOmZm2Q2XWoVp7IKjNCCS7aw31Ou5a18f6QMCIl/ggDtNjO7Gd Np1BrT5ICGgWE7O7GrLb9VqrUVEJRI0CkbRe4jYqJhAgoEYCDYK3WI0XFHCmE1mM5+k7//d9 5zvn5P9J3FRjyCEFUUZBkfMyeiNxcCT11raxYqyosD+Cs7GhKsC+q0vq2Ja2TgPbe+qsjj2Q ukSw95OHwSq989CnRp3zWviRwRmNfsSc4fANrITYVAlWcKLolzkZWV1I4h1MSVDYzvEhxiq4 HIydsQa8HI98SJQdDBcIINHFrDRav1srFJkgWpHI+12C6HYwq9cW21h2yXKbnVlZMM++6Fdj qUeQrMjm4wSv1YckiXMjq1LZcgn3NHYdMQSGpu98s69DXwmOULUgg4T0YtjdfgZoeBZ88LhB XwuMpIluAfBqrBvTNnUAXu5tTqv0tAM21T/Sq3gmXQPg/uosVYTTdzGYetdnUAmCzof9LyOY imfQ5fDiqSpMM/Cwq3JCp+GFMHnlZFpP0cXwzvh+Qkurx+Dz5r60IYMOwIGeG+lkoNzvfeJ8 uo7TFtg7eAzT7k3DaGs7rmEzHB4Y12l6M3y4rwFo+vnweEtKr+Gf4ekTz3AtOAv+988goXmz YexMD/EHsISnRISn2MNT7OEp9uOAOAfMgjcgl/vchfYFiBdk5EULeL+vCWhNNHQVjB7LiwOa BEwm9bRgrMik47ZLIV8cZJMYY6ZqZaX0Q7nfFfJwkqcsWOFFUhxAEmdmUqG1Cke5uNAuFPR/ pVjlm//Ec6bxfqVdRblsUWHhNxvGQiX550Um2q303TaEAij41ZpLkgykGtTErCByo51bBa/8 P42RGWpyppJ8QtVQUoDzSYJb4xPARkYuDMeBiRD9IsqxUDWqiFZFngpx8hx1evZMTEyMAIvy 5hmUW1VlKrM1edKIEoIpIeOjo2qIMh+TVE4lWC83J8YGS49iu2KONX1P7m05eLP01qey6mXJ V9HOPXUbPh9+kX/PYlv3Ovdfb+bWvPntZcup+Et3m7k1tKZ+6aZQTXHL75HfTjrn7C6WE4n2 vz4c2Fx1Le+Xyx3039Hq97M9Jav3+lI/yjFjdast+3bHwN3I8I650/ML+s9dfzvalmtnCMnD 2X/CgxL3BQxKDzEYBAAA
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Vladimir Kleiner <Vladimir.Kleiner@ecitele.com>, Mishael Wexler <Mishael.Wexler@ecitele.com>, pwe3 <pwe3@ietf.org>, Oren Gal <Oren.Gal@ecitele.com>, John Shirron <John.Shirron@ecitele.com>, Rotem Cohen <Rotem.Cohen@ecitele.com>, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant@cisco.com)" <stbryant@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP data plane:are they compatible?
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:04:50 -0000
Shahram, The problem IMHO is in the combination of two points : - At the LSP level both LSP OAM and PW traffic look exactly the same (after popping the Tunnel label a labeled packet remains). You can only differentiate between them when you look up the next label in the stack - When you look at the next label after having popped the tunnel label, PW packets received from both active and inactive LSPs look exactly the same with the same label from the per-platform label space. IMO this means that you cannot describe the desired behavior in the terms of RFC 3031 and 3032. Hopefully this clarifies my question. Regards, Sasha ________________________________________ From: davarish@yahoo.com [davarish@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 11:43 PM To: Alexander Vainshtein; mpls-bounces@ietf.org; Greg Mirsky Cc: mpls@ietf.org; Vladimir Kleiner; Mishael Wexler; pwe3; Oren Gal; John Shirron; Stewart Bryant (stbryant@cisco.com) Rotem Cohen Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP data plane:are they compatible? Sasha All traffic except LSP OAM traffic from protection LSP must be discarded in Rx. So what is the issue? Thx Shahram Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> Sender: mpls-bounces@ietf.org Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:58:41 To: Greg Mirsky<gregimirsky@gmail.com> Cc: mpls@ietf.org<mpls@ietf.org>; Vladimir Kleiner<Vladimir.Kleiner@ecitele.com>; Mishael Wexler<Mishael.Wexler@ecitele.com>; pwe3<pwe3@ietf.org>; Oren Gal<Oren.Gal@ecitele.com>; John Shirron<John.Shirron@ecitele.com>; Stewart Bryant \(stbryant@cisco.com\)<stbryant@cisco.com>; Rotem Cohen<Rotem.Cohen@ecitele.com> Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP data plane: are they compatible? _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof.
- [PWE3] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP data… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [PWE3] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP … Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and M… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and M… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and M… davarish
- Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and M… Shahram Davari
- Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and M… Shahram Davari
- Re: [PWE3] [mpls] 1+1 linear LSP protection and M… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP … Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [PWE3] 1+1 linear LSP protection and MPLS-TP … Alexander Vainshtein