Re: [PWE3] Poll for WG Adoption of draft-dong-pwe3-mpls-tp-li-lb-06

"Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 23 May 2014 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE0F1A0221 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 May 2014 08:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QV-5cToHxK1M for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 May 2014 08:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoemail1.alcatel.com (hoemail1.alcatel.com [192.160.6.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20C941A015C for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2014 08:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-122.lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by hoemail1.alcatel.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s4NFY8m0000503 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2014 10:34:10 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s4NFY8Sn012110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2014 17:34:08 +0200
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.23]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 23 May 2014 17:34:08 +0200
From: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>, "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] Poll for WG Adoption of draft-dong-pwe3-mpls-tp-li-lb-06
Thread-Index: AQHPdpxv9uuoHsvHR0+RcEsMmIsSkQ==
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 15:34:07 +0000
Message-ID: <CFA528A9.636A5%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.1.140326
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <9501BC1BA430DA4385C90FD578A989DF@exchange.lucent.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pwe3/285jLb_MTjh3xti3AvKttme4uPY
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Poll for WG Adoption of draft-dong-pwe3-mpls-tp-li-lb-06
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3/>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 15:34:14 -0000

All

Please use this link for the draft (the link in the email below was
incorrect).

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dong-pwe3-mpls-tp-li-lb-06

Regards

Matthew


On 23/05/2014 15:14, "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)"
<matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:


>This email begins a two week poll to help the chairs determine if
>there is consensus to adopt draft-dong-pwe3-mpls-tp-li-lb-06 as an PWE3
>working group draft.
>
>The draft can be found here:
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dong-pwe3-mpls-tp-li-lb-06
>
>Please read the draft and indicate to the list if you support
>adoption, or if you do not support adoption (giving reasons).
>
>Please note that this is only a call for adoption. There needs to be
>consensus that this draft is a good basis for the work, but it does
>not need to be perfect at this stage.
>
>Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that
>applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in
>compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for
>more details).
>
>If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
>to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The
>draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each
>author and contributor.
>
>If you are on the PWE3 WG email list but are not listed as an author
>or contributor, then please explicitly respond regarding IPR only if
>you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in
>conformance with IETF rules.
>
>The poll for adoption will close in two weeks time, on Friday 6th June.
>
>Matthew and Andy