Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

"Malis, Andrew G \(Andy\)" <andrew.g.malis@verizon.com> Thu, 06 September 2012 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew.g.malis@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A04E21F875B for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QLjPmCFBnIMc for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fldsmtpe01.verizon.com (fldsmtpe01.verizon.com [140.108.26.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE3821F8759 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false
Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi01.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.143]) by fldsmtpe01.verizon.com with ESMTP; 06 Sep 2012 17:36:23 +0000
From: "Malis, Andrew G (Andy)" <andrew.g.malis@verizon.com>
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,380,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="330411215"
Received: from fhdp1lumxc7hb04.verizon.com (HELO FHDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.59.191]) by fldsmtpi01.verizon.com with ESMTP; 06 Sep 2012 17:36:23 +0000
Received: from fhdp1lumxc7v22.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.59.158]) by FHDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.59.191]) with mapi; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 13:36:23 -0400
To: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>, "Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com>, Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:36:22 -0400
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] VCCV2
Thread-Index: Ac2MViGTx3UvENg6Q16sI6jfeAo7gw==
Message-ID: <CC6E56F3.2E491%andrew.g.malis@one.verizon.com>
In-Reply-To: <FE60A4E52763E84B935532D7D9294FF139281703FB@EUSAACMS0715.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Malis, Andrew G (Andy)" <andrew.g.malis@verizon.com>, "pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)" <pwe3@ietf.org>, "pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:36:25 -0000

Greg,

Matthew and I will have to talk with Yaakov and Tom to work that out.
Regarding the milestone, while it's true that too many cooks spoil the
broth, there's still a point where adding more cooks does help. So would
you be willing to be an additional cook to help get these out faster?

Thanks,
Andy

On 9/6/2012 13:31 , "Gregory Mirsky" <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> wrote:

Dear Andy, et al.,
Personally I don't see much difference between "then possibly B later on"
and "then B later on", as both versions suffer from unspecified timeline.
What might be reasonable milestone for 5085bis?

	Regards,
		Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Andrew G. Malis
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 10:09 AM
To: Yaakov Stein; Thomas Nadeau
Cc: pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org) pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

Yaakov and Tom,

Matthew and I just talked about the poll results. There were no votes for
option A, and the votes were pretty much split between options B and C.
Since C is a superset of B, Matthew and I are calling consensus on a
slightly modified C, with the word "possibly" removed, so that it now
reads "C - A and then B later on".

Thanks,
Andy and Matthew

On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com> wrote:
> PWE chairs,
>
> At the meeting Tom and I asked whether the WG wanted a quick update
> document, or whether a full rewrite of all the VCCV RFCs was desired.
>
> Stewart suggested that we first do a quick update and thereafter a
> "tutorial".
>
> To a quick poll at the meeting there was (in the words of the minutes)
> an underwhelming response.
>
> My own email to the list elicited only three responses.
>
> Could you ask for people to express their opinions ?
>
> (A - quick doc   B - full doc   C - A and then possibly B later on)
>
> (I guess we have heard from Stewart in favor of C, and Greg M, Dave A,
> and Mach C in favor of B.
>
>  I personally like C too.).
>
>
>
> Y(J)S
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>
_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3