Re: [PWE3] VCCV2

"Malis, Andrew G \(Andy\)" <andrew.g.malis@verizon.com> Thu, 06 September 2012 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew.g.malis@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1309C21F875E for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g1ZgASNe0vwC for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fldsmtpe03.verizon.com (fldsmtpe03.verizon.com [140.108.26.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB10D21F875B for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false
Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi01.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.143]) by fldsmtpe03.verizon.com with ESMTP; 06 Sep 2012 17:34:46 +0000
From: "Malis, Andrew G (Andy)" <andrew.g.malis@verizon.com>
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,380,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="330409549"
Received: from fhdp1lumxc7hb01.verizon.com (HELO FHDP1LUMXC7HB01.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.59.188]) by fldsmtpi01.verizon.com with ESMTP; 06 Sep 2012 17:34:46 +0000
Received: from fhdp1lumxc7v22.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.59.158]) by FHDP1LUMXC7HB01.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.59.188]) with mapi; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 13:34:46 -0400
To: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>, "Andrew G.Malis" <amalis@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:34:41 -0400
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] VCCV2
Thread-Index: Ac2MVeebqVbVD3R9RjmCMy5t5Ea7sg==
Message-ID: <CC6E567C.2E48C%andrew.g.malis@one.verizon.com>
In-Reply-To: <09A7FBA1-0EBF-4A48-B5CC-1F2D8FD238E9@lucidvision.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Malis, Andrew G (Andy)" <andrew.g.malis@verizon.com>, Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>, "pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)" <pwe3@ietf.org>, "pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pwe3-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV2
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:34:49 -0000

Tom,

Yes, a quick doc now, followed by a full 5085bis.

Cheers,
Andy

On 9/6/2012 13:31 , "Thomas Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:

	So to be clear - because I had to re-re-re-read the options listed below
3 times to get that straight in my head, we should start with doing a
quick document now.

	--Tom
 

On Sep 6, 2012:1:08 PM, at 1:08 PM, Andrew G. Malis <amalis@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yaakov and Tom,
> 
> Matthew and I just talked about the poll results. There were no votes
> for option A, and the votes were pretty much split between options B
> and C. Since C is a superset of B, Matthew and I are calling consensus
> on a slightly modified C, with the word "possibly" removed, so that it
> now reads "C ­ A and then B later on".
> 
> Thanks,
> Andy and Matthew
> 
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com> wrote:
>> PWE chairs,
>> 
>> At the meeting Tom and I asked whether the WG wanted a quick update
>> document, or whether a full rewrite of all the VCCV RFCs was desired.
>> 
>> Stewart suggested that we first do a quick update and thereafter a
>> "tutorial".
>> 
>> To a quick poll at the meeting there was (in the words of the minutes)
>>an
>> underwhelming response.
>> 
>> My own email to the list elicited only three responses.
>> 
>> Could you ask for people to express their opinions ?
>> 
>> (A ­ quick doc   B ­ full doc   C ­ A and then possibly B later on)
>> 
>> (I guess we have heard from Stewart in favor of C, and Greg M, Dave A,
>>and
>> Mach C in favor of B.
>> 
>> I personally like C too.).
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Y(J)S
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> pwe3 mailing list
>> pwe3@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>> 
>