IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] Working group last call and IPR call for dynamic Multi-Segment PW drafts

Wen Lin <wlin@juniper.net> Wed, 05 September 2012 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <wlin@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41D121F865F for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fIzJOcU4D08j for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og119.obsmtp.com (exprod7og119.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3CC21F8650 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob119.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUEerFDKMQHuf72tKDr4EUDCOrgrmO+EB@postini.com; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:42:13 PDT
Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:40:31 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 15:40:31 -0400
From: Wen Lin <wlin@juniper.net>
To: "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:40:29 -0400
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] Working group last call and IPR call for dynamic Multi-Segment PW drafts
Thread-Index: Ac2FrOuFkxCxO/QAR+GTfWThrTlevwF7fxjw
Message-ID: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C7EBF0A08E@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <CAK+d4xuqLSHfOo0Pz=nVpn2PqHNcLxeQeVS2v05NjTB-_t7H=g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK+d4xuqLSHfOo0Pz=nVpn2PqHNcLxeQeVS2v05NjTB-_t7H=g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Working group last call and IPR call for dynamic Multi-Segment PW drafts
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:42:14 -0000

When BGP is used for advertising PW address information, I think we shall specify in the section 6.1.3 that it MUST have one or more route targets associated with it since the NRLI is for L2VPN with a an AFI equals to L2VPN(25).

Thanks,
Wen

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status